Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1611024

Re: [PATCH v4] perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples for source_line_samples

From Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v4] perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples for source_line_samples
Date 2017-03-28 16:30 +0200
Message-ID <tq0id-ss-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tpYgr-7p2-61@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpZFy-8kZ-71@gated-at.bofh.it> <tq0id-ss-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 03/28/2017 11:21 PM, Taeung Song wrote:
>
>
> On 03/28/2017 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:12:05PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>>> The option 'show-total-period' works fine without a option '-l'.
>>> But if running 'perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period',
>>> you can see a problem showing only zero '0' for number of samples.
>>
>> If you do that at that point, don't you have to change the TUI not to do
>> it again?
>>
>> - Arnaldo
>>
>
> Yes, there isn't the same problem when using 't' on TUI of 'perf annotate'.

Sorry, missay the reply.

I don't change the TUI to fix same problem of this patch.
The reason are like below..

> (As you know, 't' is show-total-period option)
>
> In 'annotate' TUI, we can use the 't' functionality without the problem.
> Because of the code (util/annotate.c:911 and ui/browsers/annotate.c:412)
> as below.
>
>  881 double disasm__calc_percent(struct annotation *notes, int evidx,
> s64 offset,
>  882                             s64 end, const char **path, u64
> *nr_samples)
>  883 {
>  ...
>  910                 if (h->sum) {
>  911                         *nr_samples = hits;
>
> And,
>
>  378 static void annotate_browser__calc_percent(struct annotate_browser
> *browser,
>  379                                            struct perf_evsel *evsel)
>  380 {
>  ...
>  407                         bpos->samples[i].percent =
> disasm__calc_percent(notes,
>  408                                                 evsel->idx + i,
>  409                                                 pos->offset,
>  410                                                 next ? next->offset
> : len,
>  411                                                 &path, &nr_samples);
>  412                         bpos->samples[i].nr = nr_samples;
>
>
> And 'perf annotate --stdio --show-total-period' hasn't the problem, too.
> Because of the same code (util/annotate.c:911).
>
>
> But if with '-l', i.e. 'perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period',
> the problem happen. Because 'nr' of source_line_samples aren't
> ordinarily set
> in symbol__get_source_line() (util/annotate.c:1634~..)
> ,so fix it as this patch
>
> Are there something I missed or misunderstand ?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Taeung
>
>
>>> Before:
>>>     $ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period
>>> ...
>>>        0 :        400816:       push   %rbp
>>>        0 :        400817:       mov    %rsp,%rbp
>>>        0 :        40081a:       mov    %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
>>>        0 :        40081d:       mov    %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
>>>        0 :        400821:       mov    -0x24(%rbp),%eax
>>>        0 :        400824:       mov    -0x30(%rbp),%rdx
>>>        0 :        400828:       mov    (%rdx),%esi
>>>        0 :        40082a:       mov    $0x0,%edx
>>> ...
>>>
>>> The reason is it was missed to set number of samples
>>> of source_line_samples, so set it ordinarily.
>>>
>>> After:
>>>     $ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period
>>> ...
>>>        3 :        400816:       push   %rbp
>>>        4 :        400817:       mov    %rsp,%rbp
>>>        0 :        40081a:       mov    %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
>>>        0 :        40081d:       mov    %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
>>>        1 :        400821:       mov    -0x24(%rbp),%eax
>>>        2 :        400824:       mov    -0x30(%rbp),%rdx
>>>        0 :        400828:       mov    (%rdx),%esi
>>>        1 :        40082a:       mov    $0x0,%edx
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
>>> Fixes: 0c4a5bcea460 ("perf annotate: Display total number of samples
>>> with --show-total-period")
>>> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 6 ++++--
>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate.h | 2 +-
>>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>>> index 11af5f0..a37032b 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>>> @@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct
>>> symbol *sym, struct map *map,
>>>      start = map__rip_2objdump(map, sym->start);
>>>
>>>      for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>>> -        u64 offset;
>>> +        u64 offset, nr_samples;
>>>          double percent_max = 0.0;
>>>
>>>          src_line->nr_pcnt = nr_pcnt;
>>> @@ -1674,12 +1674,14 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct
>>> symbol *sym, struct map *map,
>>>              double percent = 0.0;
>>>
>>>              h = annotation__histogram(notes, evidx + k);
>>> +            nr_samples = h->addr[i];
>>>              if (h->sum)
>>> -                percent = 100.0 * h->addr[i] / h->sum;
>>> +                percent = 100.0 * nr_samples / h->sum;
>>>
>>>              if (percent > percent_max)
>>>                  percent_max = percent;
>>>              src_line->samples[k].percent = percent;
>>> +            src_line->samples[k].nr = nr_samples;
>>>          }
>>>
>>>          if (percent_max <= 0.5)
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
>>> index 09776b5..948aa8e 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
>>> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct cyc_hist {
>>>  struct source_line_samples {
>>>      double        percent;
>>>      double        percent_sum;
>>> -    double          nr;
>>> +    u64        nr;
>>>  };
>>>
>>>  struct source_line {
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v4] perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples for source_line_samples Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 14:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v4] perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples for  source_line_samples Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-03-28 15:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4] perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples for  source_line_samples Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 16:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4] perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples for  source_line_samples Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 16:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4] perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples for  source_line_samples Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-03-28 17:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v4] perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples for  source_line_samples Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 18:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v4] perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples for  source_line_samples Taeung Song <taeung@kosslab.kr> - 2017-03-29 11:00 +0200
  [tip:perf/core] perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples for  source_line_samples tip-bot for Taeung Song <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-04-05 08:00 +0200

csiph-web