Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1609501

[PATCH] KVM: mmu: Fix overlap with private memslots

From Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH] KVM: mmu: Fix overlap with private memslots
Date 2017-03-27 08:30 +0200
Message-ID <tpwka-3HQ-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>

Reported by syzkaller:

    pte_list_remove: ffff9714eb1f8078 0->BUG
    ------------[ cut here ]------------
    kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:1157!
    invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
    RIP: 0010:pte_list_remove+0x11b/0x120 [kvm]
    Call Trace:
     drop_spte+0x83/0xb0 [kvm]
     mmu_page_zap_pte+0xcc/0xe0 [kvm]
     kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page+0x81/0x4a0 [kvm]
     kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_all_pages+0x159/0x220 [kvm]
     kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all+0xe/0x10 [kvm]
     kvm_mmu_notifier_release+0x6c/0xa0 [kvm]
     ? kvm_mmu_notifier_release+0x5/0xa0 [kvm]
     __mmu_notifier_release+0x79/0x110
     ? __mmu_notifier_release+0x5/0x110
     exit_mmap+0x15a/0x170
     ? do_exit+0x281/0xcb0
     mmput+0x66/0x160
     do_exit+0x2c9/0xcb0
     ? __context_tracking_exit.part.5+0x4a/0x150
     do_group_exit+0x50/0xd0
     SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20
     do_syscall_64+0x73/0x1f0
     entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25

The reason is that when creates new memslot, there is no guarantee for new 
memslot not overlap with private memslots. This can be triggered by the 
following program:
	
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <setjmp.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stddef.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/kvm.h>

long r[16];

int main()
{
	void *p = valloc(0x4000);

	r[2] = open("/dev/kvm", 0);
	r[3] = ioctl(r[2], KVM_CREATE_VM, 0x0ul);

	uint64_t addr = 0xf000;
	ioctl(r[3], KVM_SET_IDENTITY_MAP_ADDR, &addr);
	r[6] = ioctl(r[3], KVM_CREATE_VCPU, 0x0ul);
	ioctl(r[3], KVM_SET_TSS_ADDR, 0x0ul);
	ioctl(r[6], KVM_RUN, 0);
	ioctl(r[6], KVM_RUN, 0);

	struct kvm_userspace_memory_region mr = {
		.slot = 0,
		.flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES,
		.guest_phys_addr = 0xf000,
		.memory_size = 0x4000,
		.userspace_addr = (uintptr_t) p
	};
	ioctl(r[3], KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION, &mr);
	return 0;
}

This bug is caused by 'commit 5419369ed6bd ("KVM: Fix user memslot overlap 
check")' which removes the check to avoid to add new memslot who overlaps 
with private memslots. This patch fixes it by not add new memslot if it 
is also overlap with private memslots.

Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.10+   
Fixes: 5419369ed (KVM: Fix user memslot overlap check)
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
---
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index a17d787..ddeb18a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -978,8 +978,7 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
 		/* Check for overlaps */
 		r = -EEXIST;
 		kvm_for_each_memslot(slot, __kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id)) {
-			if ((slot->id >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS) ||
-			    (slot->id == id))
+			if (slot->id == id)
 				continue;
 			if (!((base_gfn + npages <= slot->base_gfn) ||
 			      (base_gfn >= slot->base_gfn + slot->npages)))
-- 
2.7.4

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] KVM: mmu: Fix overlap with private memslots  Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 08:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] KVM: mmu: Fix overlap with private memslots David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-04-03 14:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] KVM: mmu: Fix overlap with private memslots Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com> - 2017-04-03 14:40 +0200

csiph-web