Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral

From	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral
Date	2017-03-28 15:30 +0200
Message-ID	<tpZm9-8cB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tohwR-7sz-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:

> If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should
> immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to parsing
> unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Can I get some indication from Mika/Rafael/Andy whether this is correct?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get  a deferral Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-03-28 15:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we  get a deferral Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-28 15:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we  get a deferral Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-28 17:10 +0200

csiph-web