Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1610629
| From | Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility |
| Date | 2017-03-28 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tpY6K-7lr-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tkjQB-7HV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2017-03-12 23:00, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > The code from libc-compat.h depends on some glibc specific defines and > causes compile problems with the musl libc. These patches remove some > of the glibc dependencies. With these patches the LEDE (OpenWrt) base > user space applications can be build with unmodified kernel headers and > musl libc. > > This was compile tested with the user space from LEDE (OpenWrt) with > musl 1.1.16, glibc 2.25 and uClibc-ng 1.0.22. > > David Heidelberger (1): > uapi/if_ether.h: prevent redefinition of struct ethhdr > > Hauke Mehrtens (3): > uapi glibc compat: add libc compat code when not build for kernel > uapi glibc compat: fix build if libc defines IFF_ECHO > uapi glibc compat: Do not check for __USE_MISC > > include/uapi/linux/if_ether.h | 3 +++ > include/uapi/linux/libc-compat.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------ > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Did I send this to the correct maintainer? I am unsure through which maintainer this should go. I saw that some patches for the libc-compat.h file went trough David Miller, so I tried the same. Hauke
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 0/4] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> - 2017-03-28 14:10 +0200
csiph-web