Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1610087

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] gcc-plugins: Add the initify gcc plugin

From Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] gcc-plugins: Add the initify gcc plugin
Date 2017-03-27 21:40 +0200
Message-ID <tpIEG-4B0-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t5NnA-5bA-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5NnA-5bA-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpzi1-5Ua-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpFx8-2mb-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpIEG-4B0-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Rasmus Villemoes
<linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27 2017, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Andrew Donnellan
>> <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> On 01/02/17 07:24, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> The kernel already has a mechanism to free up code and data memory that
>>>> is only used during kernel or module initialization.  This plugin will
>>>> teach the compiler to find more such code and data that can be freed
>>>> after initialization.
>>>
>>>
>>> Currently checking whether we can wire this up for powerpc without too many
>>> problems...
>>
>> Cool, thanks. FWIW, note that this plugin is a bit back-burnered at
>> the moment. I've got this in my -next tree still, but it needs some
>> rather large changes to how it does its annotations before Linus will
>> accept it.
>
> Why not just hardcode the annotations in the plugin itself? I'd expect
> just making it know about mem*, str*, and the various *printf/printk
> functions would get 90% of the benefits. The prototypes of these
> aren't gonna change anytime soon, so there's no compelling reason to
> keep the annotations with the declarations. The plugin can still do
> its sanity checking when it compiles a function with one of these names.

Yup, I think that's another entirely workable solution too. I just
meant to say that I don't have time at the moment to look at it (if
you want to, please do), and I think Emese is already happy with how
the annotations work, so I don't think she'd want to work on it either
(but she can correct me if I'm wrong).

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v5 1/4] gcc-plugins: Add the initify  gcc plugin Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> - 2017-03-27 11:40 +0200
  Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v5 1/4] gcc-plugins: Add the initify  gcc plugin Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-03-27 18:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] gcc-plugins: Add the initify gcc plugin Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-03-27 21:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] gcc-plugins: Add the initify gcc plugin Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> - 2017-03-27 21:40 +0200
    Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v5 1/4] gcc-plugins: Add the initify  gcc plugin Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-03-28 10:00 +0200
      Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v5 1/4] gcc-plugins: Add the initify  gcc plugin Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-03-28 21:10 +0200
        Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v5 1/4] gcc-plugins: Add the initify  gcc plugin Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-03-28 22:40 +0200
  Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v5 1/4] gcc-plugins: Add the initify  gcc plugin Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> - 2017-03-28 05:10 +0200
    Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v5 1/4] gcc-plugins: Add the initify  gcc plugin Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-03-28 21:10 +0200

csiph-web