Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1609902
| From | Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] of: fix node traversing in of_dma_get_range |
| Date | 2017-03-27 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tpE82-11f-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <toMAF-4Hq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <toMAF-4Hq-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpDYm-XG-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Rob, On 27/03/17 15:34, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Oza Pawandeep <oza.oza@broadcom.com> wrote: >> it jumps to the parent node without examining the child node. >> also with that, it throws "no dma-ranges found for node" >> for pci dma-ranges. >> >> this patch fixes device node traversing for dma-ranges. > > What's the DT look like that doesn't work? The problem is the bodge in pci_dma_configure() where we don't have an OF node for the actual device itself, so pass in the host bridge's OF node instead. This happens to work well enough for dma-coherent, but I don't think dma-ranges was even considered at the time. As it happens I'm currently halfway through writing an experiment wherein pci_dma_configure() creates a temporary child node for the of_dma_configure() call if no other suitable alternative (e.g. some intermediate bridge node) exists. How hard are you likely to NAK that approach? ;) > dma-ranges is supposed to be a bus property, not a device's property. > So looking at the parent is correct behavior generally. Indeed, this patch as-is will break currently correct DTs (because we won't find dma-ranges on the device, so will bail before even looking at the parent as we should). Robin. > > Rob >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 1/3] of/pci: dma-ranges to account highest possible host bridge dma_mask Oza Pawandeep <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-03-25 06:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 3/3] of: fix node traversing in of_dma_get_range Oza Pawandeep <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-03-25 06:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] of: fix node traversing in of_dma_get_range Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-03-27 16:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] of: fix node traversing in of_dma_get_range Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2017-03-27 16:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] of: fix node traversing in of_dma_get_range Oza Oza <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-03-28 07:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] of/pci: dma-ranges to account highest possible host bridge dma_mask Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-03-27 17:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] of/pci: dma-ranges to account highest possible host bridge dma_mask Oza Oza <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-03-28 07:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] of/pci: dma-ranges to account highest possible host bridge dma_mask Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-03-28 16:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] of/pci: dma-ranges to account highest possible host bridge dma_mask Oza Oza <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-03-30 12:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] of/pci: dma-ranges to account highest possible host bridge dma_mask Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2017-03-28 16:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] of/pci: dma-ranges to account highest possible host bridge dma_mask Oza Oza <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-03-29 06:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] of/pci: dma-ranges to account highest possible host bridge dma_mask Oza Oza <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-03-30 05:30 +0200
csiph-web