Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1609887

[PATCH] sd: Consider max_xfer_blocks if opt_xfer_blocks is unusable

From Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH] sd: Consider max_xfer_blocks if opt_xfer_blocks is unusable
Date 2017-03-27 16:30 +0200
Message-ID <tpDOG-Ur-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


If device reports a small max_xfer_blocks and a zero opt_xfer_blocks, we
end up using BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS, which is wrong and r/w of that size
may get error.

Fixes: ca369d51b3e ("block/sd: Fix device-imposed transfer length limits")
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/sd.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index fcfeddc..e2e21ab 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -2957,6 +2957,7 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
 		rw_max = logical_to_sectors(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks);
 	} else
 		rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
+	rw_max = min_not_zero(rw_max, dev_max);
 
 	/* Combine with controller limits */
 	q->limits.max_sectors = min(rw_max, queue_max_hw_sectors(q));
-- 
2.9.3

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] sd: Consider max_xfer_blocks if opt_xfer_blocks is unusable Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> - 2017-03-27 16:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] sd: Consider max_xfer_blocks if opt_xfer_blocks is  unusable Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> - 2017-03-27 18:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] sd: Consider max_xfer_blocks if opt_xfer_blocks is unusable "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> - 2017-03-28 04:20 +0200

csiph-web