Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1608381
| From | Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations |
| Date | 2017-03-24 13:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <towPg-1DH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tl0iR-4M7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tl0iS-4M7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tormy-64z-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <torFU-6sZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tov6P-la-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > > * Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > >> > Are just utterly disgusting that turn perfectly readable code into an >> > unreadable, unmaintainable mess. >> > >> > You need to find some better, cleaner solution please, or convince me that no >> > such solution is possible. NAK for the time being. >> >> Well, I can just write all functions as is. Does it better confirm to kernel >> style? > > I think writing the prototypes out as-is, properly organized, beats any of these > macro based solutions. You mean write out the prototypes, but use what for definitions? Macros again? >> [...] I've just looked at the x86 atomic.h and it uses macros for similar >> purpose (ATOMIC_OP/ATOMIC_FETCH_OP), so I thought that must be idiomatic kernel >> style... > > Mind fixing those too while at it? I don't mind once I understand how exactly you want it to look. > And please squash any bug fixes and re-send a clean series against latest upstream > or so. > > Thanks, > > Ingo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/3] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-14 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-03-20 18:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-03-21 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-21 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-03-21 22:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-22 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-03-22 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-22 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-03-22 13:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-03-24 08:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-24 08:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-24 09:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-03-24 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic, x86: wrap atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-24 13:50 +0100
csiph-web