Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1607195

Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: use a dedicated workqueue for the free workers

From Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: use a dedicated workqueue for the free workers
Date 2017-03-23 08:40 +0100
Message-ID <to5vK-7s8-49@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <tld6q-5vn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnI65-6zm-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnK7T-81a-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnKhz-85F-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnOOd-3b8-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 09:43:04PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 05:55:12PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:41:04PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > My understanding of the unbound workqueue is that it will create a
> > > thread pool for each node, versus each CPU as in the bound workqueue
> > > case, and use threads from the thread pool(create threads if not enough)
> > > to do the work.
> > 
> > Yes, that was my understand so I read code and found that
> > 
> > insert_work:
> >         ..
> >         if (__need_more_worker(pool))
> >                 wake_up_worker(pool); 
> > 
> > so I thought if there is a running thread in that node, workqueue
> > will not wake any other threads so parallelism should be max 2.
> > AFAIK, if the work goes sleep, scheduler will spawn new worker
> > thread so the active worker could be a lot but I cannot see any
> > significant sleepable point in that work(ie, batch_free_work).
> 
> Looks like worker_thread() will spawn new worker through manage_worker().
> 
> Note that pool->nr_running will always be zero for an unbound workqueue
> and thus need_more_worker() will return true as long as there are queued
> work items in the pool.

Aha, it solves my wonder. Thanks a lot!

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 3/5] mm: use a dedicated workqueue for the free workers Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> - 2017-03-15 10:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: use a dedicated workqueue for the free workers Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-03-22 07:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: use a dedicated workqueue for the free workers Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> - 2017-03-22 09:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: use a dedicated workqueue for the free workers Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-03-22 10:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: use a dedicated workqueue for the free workers Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> - 2017-03-22 14:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: use a dedicated workqueue for the free workers Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-03-23 08:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: use a dedicated workqueue for the free workers Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2017-03-23 16:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: use a dedicated workqueue for the free workers Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> - 2017-03-24 13:40 +0100

csiph-web