Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1607178
| From | Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Updates, autofocus, 5Mpix mode on N900? Re: [RFC 08/13] smiapp-pll: Take existing divisor into account in minimum divisor check |
| Date | 2017-03-23 08:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <to5vH-7s8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <taTsl-7x0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tb5Wy-7HU-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfQDw-5uI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfQWR-5Cn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnYaS-1YM-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Pavel, On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:46:51AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2017-02-28 16:16:21, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 03:09:21PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Can I get you to apply this one? :-). > > > > Let me try to understand again what does that change actually do. I'll find > > the time during the rest of this week. > > > > I'm starting to think we need a test suite for the PLL calculator... > > Any update here or on the other patch? We are quite close to working > camera now... I've been working on PLL test cases. The PLL calculator really requires that to be able to test any changes made to it. > > Plus I have played with v4l-utils, and managed to implement autofocus > and autoexposure -- it was easier than expected. I believe you > mentioned you had some patches to automatically initialize the > pipeline. Do you and can I have them? It was an early prototype and it wasn't really functional yet. Given a video node, it can find possible pipelines to the image sources with common formats. I.e. the ccdc -> rsz path is not available for raw cameras. C (especially without helper libraries) wasn't particularly suitable for the task, the data structures I had didn't end up too nice. What would also be necessary is to associate library or application specific data to entities, this could be as simple as key-value pairs with both key and value being pointers. > > Last thing.. Is someone able to compute new modes for et8ek8? I > believe smaller than 640x480 mode would be useful for video streaming, > and I still can't get 5MPix mode to work; understanding what goes on > there would be useful. Unfortunately the et8ek8 does not conform to a standard such as SMIA. :-( I'm not sure the datasheet provides enough information to come up with new mode definitions. Perhaps with some experimentation it could be possible. There are a few additional embedded documents in it, those are worth checking out. LibreOffice can open them AFAIR. -- Regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi XMPP: sailus@retiisi.org.uk
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Updates, autofocus, 5Mpix mode on N900? Re: [RFC 08/13] smiapp-pll: Take existing divisor into account in minimum divisor check Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-03-23 00:50 +0100
Re: Updates, autofocus, 5Mpix mode on N900? Re: [RFC 08/13] smiapp-pll: Take existing divisor into account in minimum divisor check Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-03-23 01:20 +0100
Re: Updates, autofocus, 5Mpix mode on N900? Re: [RFC 08/13] smiapp-pll: Take existing divisor into account in minimum divisor check Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi> - 2017-03-23 08:40 +0100
Re: Updates, autofocus, 5Mpix mode on N900? Re: [RFC 08/13] smiapp-pll: Take existing divisor into account in minimum divisor check Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-03-23 14:30 +0100
csiph-web