Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1605531
| From | Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module |
| Date | 2017-03-21 12:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tnqsz-2K1-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <tm350-Ro-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tm3eG-UG-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tn8Fl-7tv-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnilk-5Lg-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnp3s-1Vs-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:16:45AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
[...]
> >>In my opinion booting with "nohlt" on the cmd line is sufficient to
> >>determine if we should use the driver or not. That way we also avoid
> >>declaring yet another sysfs flag, something I really want to avoid.
> >
> >Agree.
> >
> >I did spend some time to implement coresight core framework to support
> >debug module, you could see it on:http://termbin.com/k2fj; this also
> >gives me more sense which is better choice. If declaring another sysfs
> >flag to support debug module in coresight framework, this lets the
> >codes and interfaces more complex. E.g. for best fit into coresight
> >framework, finally we can get 8 sysfs nodes for 8 CPUs in system; so
> >that means we need enable every CPU one by one.
>
> Having a node for each debug area indeed doesn't look good. We could
> as will stick a single node under /sys/kernel/debug/ which would enable/disable
> the debug component.
>
> I am OK with it being tied to nohlt. In that case we will have to add
> a Kconfig dependency on GENERIC_IDLE_POLL_SETUP (though it is selected
> by default on ARM/ARM64). Parsing the boot command line for nohlt doesn't
> look like a good idea. We may have to figure out a way to do that.
I remembered that we can use QoS constraint for CPUIdle:
pm_qos_add_request(pm_qos_req, PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY, 0);
Using this way we can disable all low power states and don't depend on
nohlt anymore.
> Also, please could you add support for building this as a module ? Since it
> doesn't depend on the coresight bus anyway, it should be pretty straight
> forward.
Yeah. Will support module building.
Thanks,
Leo Yan
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2017-03-15 17:50 +0100
Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> - 2017-03-15 21:50 +0100
Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2017-03-17 11:50 +0100
Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> - 2017-03-17 17:00 +0100
Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2017-03-17 17:40 +0100
Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2017-03-17 17:50 +0100
Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2017-03-20 13:40 +0100
Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> - 2017-03-20 17:50 +0100
Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2017-03-21 04:10 +0100
Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2017-03-21 11:20 +0100
Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2017-03-21 12:50 +0100
Re: [v3 3/5] coresight: add support for debug module Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> - 2017-03-21 16:30 +0100
csiph-web