Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1605441

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: VMX: Fix enable VPID even if INVVPID is not exposed in vmx capability

Path csiph.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!diesel.cu.mi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: VMX: Fix enable VPID even if INVVPID is not exposed in vmx capability
Date Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:00:02 +0100
Message-ID <tnnO2-Sm-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tnjAJ-6z6-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnjAJ-6z6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnnO2-Sm-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8+fp/mC1VlBVMc+UvMeyw+mOK/ahBbyi26UqKOv2SlU=; b=UWd5BAFn9ukE75baI1pCsY3nmuiThrvw/G9/PM7AexzDLz6XhC0aD9aIfZPFycXse9 Am2iFfzT6zwTc5EFbl+Gbvc0WUFY4vLpak9A77FCDuVk1r0d5adxfSWAOmdIDnnJEMak FSdvJJFApAFnuWpd2SsGAfPk9Q9hWrxHT1/5jw3ioqo0cVHJdKoho3RAmg+FwUUTNG+s QCDtIAzEpKVTJ4ejVb/HVRfSopkumOKYxU3Nplelui3zDhujHf8WXZT3mPRgTXjduzPw GjsLBo+7rfR9pZhko/cEa6CoFM8jWB045oBumlQskP5NvWPaFe1g4HvQ4dNokHCRzGMG 0T8w==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8+fp/mC1VlBVMc+UvMeyw+mOK/ahBbyi26UqKOv2SlU=; b=IQ4EfVhbd1vNpDUsb5zTGRyGW37doEDPuu6+k2WauBeJZ2DbSBNTNhsHIsu+8gTdx6 GBLcg707pP+Y3yUGl1dLCkZjeM3bNyeOdcifWoUP4vKCV1dgc4NOe2lXWz2o31REYvGY O7R/aYoL9CMikN4Ie9+1a2nMSqeTL4z6gFs1PtLJBN5cjtggBnKiQf7Y5bQmyryQCJJP zkXngGQKWltqab0A82p91yJVxRsP20NpCwaUr9seL1HTPcDu/1V68G5/8jY3LuAZq4OK P1+R5kKE95Veh8WXsyBSvTv8Id9az6wuoZA2WzjfM0eTeJkZm2kt6XGX8DfYGTVofnNd CVaA==
X-Gm-Message-State AFeK/H3G67RX2xPU8zOeiZ+1l7ZTKKsia12UIwnvZ6twcTNLxA9DnmIHI8w9M+u8Lbn2aBLHwoLA9gxdmk75/A==
X-Received by 10.223.139.154 with SMTP id o26mr27988960wra.56.1490086725832; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 111
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
X-Original-Date Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:58:45 +0800
X-Original-Message-ID <CANRm+CxJuYvMbrx72qCGKAdURZ+M=hm+oKXEF7K-g=u-mmTURw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <1490069935-6232-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> <1490069935-6232-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> <6b112918-a785-bf87-71c4-8649915e7772@redhat.com>
X-Original-Sender linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref csiph.com linux.kernel:1605441

Show key headers only | View raw


2017-03-21 16:50 GMT+08:00 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>:
> On 21.03.2017 05:18, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
>>
>> This can be reproduced by running L2 on L1, and disable VPID on L0 if w/o
>> commit "KVM: nVMX: Fix nested VPID vmx exec control", the L2 crash as below:
>>
>> KVM: entry failed, hardware error 0x7
>> EAX=00000000 EBX=00000000 ECX=00000000 EDX=000306c3
>> ESI=00000000 EDI=00000000 EBP=00000000 ESP=00000000
>> EIP=0000fff0 EFL=00000002 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
>> ES =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
>> CS =f000 ffff0000 0000ffff 00009b00
>> SS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
>> DS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
>> FS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
>> GS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
>> LDT=0000 00000000 0000ffff 00008200
>> TR =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00008b00
>> GDT=     00000000 0000ffff
>> IDT=     00000000 0000ffff
>> CR0=60000010 CR2=00000000 CR3=00000000 CR4=00000000
>> DR0=0000000000000000 DR1=0000000000000000 DR2=0000000000000000 DR3=0000000000000000
>> DR6=00000000ffff0ff0 DR7=0000000000000400
>> EFER=0000000000000000
>>
>> Reference SDM 30.3 INVVPID:
>>
>> Protected Mode Exceptions
>> #UD
>>   - If not in VMX operation.
>>   - If the logical processor does not support VPIDs (IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2[37]=0).
>>   - If the logical processor supports VPIDs (IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2[37]=1) but does
>>     not support the INVVPID instruction (IA32_VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP[32]=0).
>>
>> So we should check both VPID enable bit in vmx exec control and INVVPID support bit
>> in vmx capability MSRs to enable VPID. This patch adds the guarantee to not enable VPID
>> if INVVPID is not exposed in vmx capability MSRs.
>>
>
> Makes sense to me. Wonder how many systems are out there that have VPID
> but not INVVPID? Or will this never happen on real hardware?

At least this will not happen on the real hardware on my hands.

>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> index 06d8080..b310214 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> @@ -1239,6 +1239,11 @@ static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_global(void)
>>       return vmx_capability.vpid & VMX_VPID_EXTENT_GLOBAL_CONTEXT_BIT;
>>  }
>>
>> +static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_invvpid(void)
>> +{
>> +     return vmx_capability.vpid & VMX_VPID_INVVPID_BIT;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_ept(void)
>>  {
>>       return vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
>> @@ -6519,8 +6524,10 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
>>       if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NX))
>>               kvm_enable_efer_bits(EFER_NX);
>>
>> -     if (!cpu_has_vmx_vpid())
>> +     if (!cpu_has_vmx_vpid() ||
>> +             !(cpu_has_vmx_invvpid()))
>
> This indentation looks weird. Can't this be fit into one line?

The same as cpu_has_vmx_ept_4levels().

>
>>               enable_vpid = 0;
>> +
>
> unrelated change

To make the vpid codes more clear. Please refer to other callees in
hardware_setup().

>
>>       if (!cpu_has_vmx_shadow_vmcs())
>>               enable_shadow_vmcs = 0;
>>       if (enable_shadow_vmcs)
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> David

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: VMX: Fix enable VPID even if INVVPID is not exposed in vmx capability Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 05:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: VMX: Fix enable VPID even if INVVPID is not  exposed in vmx capability David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-03-21 10:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: VMX: Fix enable VPID even if INVVPID is not  exposed in vmx capability Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 10:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: VMX: Fix enable VPID even if INVVPID is not  exposed in vmx capability Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 10:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: VMX: Fix enable VPID even if INVVPID is not  exposed in vmx capability David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-03-21 10:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: VMX: Fix enable VPID even if INVVPID is not  exposed in vmx capability David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-03-21 10:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: VMX: Fix enable VPID even if INVVPID is not  exposed in vmx capability Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-03-21 17:30 +0100

csiph-web