Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1605325
| From | Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace |
| Date | 2017-03-21 07:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tnl9v-7Kc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tmZiH-RH-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tn1DP-2AT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tn3cC-3xv-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tn3vZ-3VF-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 20 March 2017 at 19:09, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> writes: > >> Hi Alex, >> >> On 20 March 2017 at 16:49, Alexander Shishkin >> <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>> Hi Chunyan, >>> >>> A couple of clarifications: iirc this applies to the function tracer >>> of ftrace, right? Does it make sense to mention that? Also, are you >> >> Right, only applies to the function tracer currently (actually only >> function address and parent function address of Function tracer is >> recorded into STM, I mean it doesn't include like "pid" "task name" >> "cpu-id" these information right now). It makes sense to mention >> function tracer, I will address that. > > Thanks! > >>> planning to support other ftrace payloads like trace_printk()s? >> >> No plan so far, but I think I can consider to do that, it depends on >> how many people think that are helpful. >> What do you think? > > Well, I myself almost never use function tracer, but I do use > tracepoints/trace_printk()s. I'm *guessing* that everybody who's In fact I had implemented exporting tracepoints to STM and tried upstreaming that, but Steven Rostedt and Ingo expressed their worries on that would introduce a considerable impact on Ftrace fast path since a tracepoint basically was a string which was too long to be written to STM with some acceptable impact on fast path, so I stopped upstreaming that feature. Thanks, Chunyan > subsystem implement tracepoints will be interested in those. > > I confess that I haven't yet looked at the code properly, so I'm a don't > have a picture of what it will take to implement these. > > Regards, > -- > Alex
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com> - 2017-03-20 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-20 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-20 12:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 07:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-21 08:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 13:30 +0100
csiph-web