Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1605224

Re: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before enabling SR-IOV

From Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before enabling SR-IOV
Date 2017-03-21 01:50 +0100
Message-ID <tng9P-4bM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tn7pT-6E2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tneB4-3ga-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tng9P-4bM-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 06:34:23PM -0500, Bodong Wang wrote:
>On 3/20/2017 6:07 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:14:34PM +0200, bodong@mellanox.com wrote:
>>>From: Bodong Wang <bodong@mellanox.com>
>>>
>>>Sometimes it is not desirable to probe the virtual functions after
>>>SRIOV is enabled. This can save host side resource usage by VF
>>>instances which would be eventually probed to VMs.
>>>
>>>Added a new PCI sysfs interface "sriov_probe_vfs" to control that
>>>from PF, all current callers still retain the same functionality.
>>>To modify it, echo 0/n/N (disable probe) or 1/y/Y (enable probe) to
>>>
>>>/sys/bus/pci/devices/<DOMAIN:BUS:DEVICE.FUNCTION>/sriov_probe_vfs
>>>
>>>Note that, the choice must be made before enabling VFs. The change
>>>will not take effect if VFs are already enabled. Simply, one can set
>>>sriov_numvfs to 0, choose whether to probe or not, and then resume
>>>sriov_numvfs.
>>>
>>Bodong, I'm not sure if there is a requirement to load driver for the
>>specified number of VFs? That indicates no driver will be loaded for
>>other VFs. If so, this interface might serve the purpose as well.
>Gavin, thanks for the review. That is indeed an interesting suggestion.
>Theoretically,  we can change that probe_vfs from boolean to integer. And use
>it as a counter to probe the first N VFs(if N < total_vfs).  Let's see if
>there are any objections.

Ok.

>>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>+	if (!pci_dev->is_virtfn ||
>>+	    (pci_dev->is_virtfn && pci_dev->physfn->sriov->probe_vfs)) {
>>+#endif
>>+		error = __pci_device_probe(drv, pci_dev);
>>+		if (error) {
>>+			pcibios_free_irq(pci_dev);
>>+			pci_dev_put(pci_dev);
>>+		}
>>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>	}
>>+#endif
>>
>>I think it's reasonable to have a inline function for this check:
>It's doable, but what's the benefit?
>>
>>#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>static inline bool pci_device_can_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>{
>>	return (!pdev->is_virtfn || pdev->physfn->sriov->probe_vfs);
>should be return (!pdev->is_virtfn || (pci_dev->is_virtfn &&
>pci_dev->physfn->sriov->probe_vfs));
>
>We want to probe that device if 1) it's a PF 2) it'a VF and probe_vfs is set
>>}
>>#else
>>static inline bool pci_device_can_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>{
>>	return true;
>>}
>This function will be a waste if CONFIG_PCI_IOV is not defined.
>>#endif

It makes the code a bit clean. Nope, the proposed conditional
expression is elaborate. Yeah, the purpose is exactly same as
you said: probe driver for non-VF or VFs that were allowed.

     (!pdev->is_virtfn || pdev->physfn->sriov->probe_vfs);

When pdev->is_virtfn is flase, "pdev->physfn->sriov->probe_vfs"
doesn't take effect. Otherwise, it means pdev->is_virtfn is true
indirectly and going to check "pdev->physfn->sriov->probe_vfs".
So it needn't check pdev->is_virtfn explicitly in later case,
but it isn't wrong :)

Thanks,
Gavin

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before enabling SR-IOV bodong@mellanox.com - 2017-03-20 16:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before  enabling SR-IOV Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-03-21 00:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before  enabling SR-IOV Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-03-21 01:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before  enabling SR-IOV Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-03-21 06:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before  enabling SR-IOV Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-03-21 06:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before  enabling SR-IOV Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-03-21 07:20 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before  enabling SR-IOV Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-03-21 10:30 +0100
            RE: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before  enabling SR-IOV Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.com> - 2017-03-21 15:40 +0100
              Re: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before  enabling SR-IOV Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-03-22 00:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before  enabling SR-IOV Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-03-21 15:40 +0100
              Re: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before  enabling SR-IOV Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-03-22 00:50 +0100

csiph-web