Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1606838
| From | Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] kasan: report only the first error |
| Date | 2017-03-22 18:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tnSyv-6bg-65@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tnRsJ-5on-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnRsJ-5on-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnRVM-5RD-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnRVM-5RD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnSoN-63J-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Andrey Ryabinin >> <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> wrote: >>> On 03/22/2017 07:34 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Andrey Ryabinin >>>> <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> wrote: >>>>> Disable kasan after the first report. There are several reasons for this: >>>>> * Single bug quite often has multiple invalid memory accesses causing >>>>> storm in the dmesg. >>>>> * Write OOB access might corrupt metadata so the next report will print >>>>> bogus alloc/free stacktraces. >>>>> * Reports after the first easily could be not bugs by itself but just side >>>>> effects of the first one. >>>>> >>>>> Given that multiple reports only do harm, it makes sense to disable >>>>> kasan after the first one. Except for the tests in lib/test_kasan.c >>>>> as we obviously want to see all reports from test. >>>> >>>> Hi Andrey, >>>> >>>> Could you make it configurable via CONFIG_KASAN_SOMETHING (which can >>>> default to showing only the first report)? >>> >>> I'd rather make this boot time configurable, but wouldn't want to without >>> a good reason. >> >> That would work for me. Also note that KASAN now supports panic_on_warn=1, which achieves more or less the same. Of course, WARNINGs may be not that bad, but KASAN reports may be not tool bad as well (e.g. off-by-one reads). >>>> I sometimes use KASAN to see what bad accesses a particular bug >>>> causes, and seeing all of them (even knowing that they may be >>>> corrupt/induced) helps a lot. >>> >>> I'm wondering why you need to see all reports? >> >> To get a better picture of what are the consequences of a bug. For >> example whether it leads to some bad or controllable memory >> corruption. Sometimes it's easier to let KASAN track the memory >> accesses then do that manually. > Another case is when you're seeing an OOB read at boot time, which has > limited impact, and you don't want to wait for the code owner to fix > it to move forward. >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> > > > > -- > Alexander Potapenko > Software Engineer > > Google Germany GmbH > Erika-Mann-Straße, 33 > 80636 München > > Geschäftsführer: Matthew Scott Sucherman, Paul Terence Manicle > Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] kasan: report only the first error Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> - 2017-03-22 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] kasan: report only the first error Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> - 2017-03-22 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] kasan: report only the first error Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> - 2017-03-22 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] kasan: report only the first error Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-22 18:50 +0100
csiph-web