Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1606838

Re: [PATCH] kasan: report only the first error

From Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] kasan: report only the first error
Date 2017-03-22 18:50 +0100
Message-ID <tnSyv-6bg-65@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tnRsJ-5on-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnRsJ-5on-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnRVM-5RD-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnRVM-5RD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnSoN-63J-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Andrey Ryabinin
>> <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
>>> On 03/22/2017 07:34 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Andrey Ryabinin
>>>> <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
>>>>> Disable kasan after the first report. There are several reasons for this:
>>>>>  * Single bug quite often has multiple invalid memory accesses causing
>>>>>     storm in the dmesg.
>>>>>  * Write OOB access might corrupt metadata so the next report will print
>>>>>     bogus alloc/free stacktraces.
>>>>>  * Reports after the first easily could be not bugs by itself but just side
>>>>>     effects of the first one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that multiple reports only do harm, it makes sense to disable
>>>>> kasan after the first one. Except for the tests in lib/test_kasan.c
>>>>> as we obviously want to see all reports from test.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Andrey,
>>>>
>>>> Could you make it configurable via CONFIG_KASAN_SOMETHING (which can
>>>> default to showing only the first report)?
>>>
>>> I'd rather make this boot time configurable, but wouldn't want to without
>>> a good reason.
>>
>> That would work for me.

Also note that KASAN now supports panic_on_warn=1, which achieves more
or less the same. Of course, WARNINGs may be not that bad, but KASAN
reports may be not tool bad as well (e.g. off-by-one reads).


>>>> I sometimes use KASAN to see what bad accesses a particular bug
>>>> causes, and seeing all of them (even knowing that they may be
>>>> corrupt/induced) helps a lot.
>>>
>>> I'm wondering why you need to see all reports?
>>
>> To get a better picture of what are the consequences of a bug. For
>> example whether it leads to some bad or controllable memory
>> corruption. Sometimes it's easier to let KASAN track the memory
>> accesses then do that manually.
> Another case is when you're seeing an OOB read at boot time, which has
> limited impact, and you don't want to wait for the code owner to fix
> it to move forward.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alexander Potapenko
> Software Engineer
>
> Google Germany GmbH
> Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
> 80636 München
>
> Geschäftsführer: Matthew Scott Sucherman, Paul Terence Manicle
> Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] kasan: report only the first error Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> - 2017-03-22 17:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] kasan: report only the first error Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> - 2017-03-22 18:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] kasan: report only the first error Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> - 2017-03-22 18:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] kasan: report only the first error Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-22 18:50 +0100

csiph-web