Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1606208
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage |
| Date | 2017-03-22 05:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tnGnD-5mA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <tnyzM-8nv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnzma-yy-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnABA-1iQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnC0G-2r8-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnCDn-2El-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Linus Torvalds
>>> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> wrote:
>>>>> The issue seems to be related to exceptions happening in close pages
>>>>> to the fixmap GDT remapping.
>>>>>
>>>>> The original page fault happen in do_test_wp_bit which set a fixmap
>>>>> entry to test WP flag. If I grow the number of processors supported
>>>>> increasing the distance between the remapped GDT page and the WP test
>>>>> page, the error does not reproduce.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am still looking at the exact distance between repro and no-repro as
>>>>> well as the exact root cause.
>>>>
>>>> Hmm. Have we set the GDT limit incorrectly, somehow? The GDT *can*
>>>> cover 8k entries, which at 8 bytes each would be 64kB.
>>>
>>> The QEMU barf says the GDT limit is 0xff, for better or for worse.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> So somebody trying to load an invalid segment (say, 0xffff) might end
>>>> up causing an access to the GDT base + 64k - 8.
>>>>
>>>> It is also possible that the CPU might do a page table writability
>>>> check *before* it does the limit check. That would sound odd, though.
>>>> Might be a CPU errata.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>> There's presumably something genuinely wrong with our GDT.
>>
>> This is suspicious. I added this code in test_wp_bit:
>>
>> if (memcmp(get_current_gdt_ro(), get_current_gdt_rw(), 4096) != 0) {
>> pr_err("Oh crap\n");
>> BUG_ON(1);
>> }
>>
>> It printed "Oh crap" and blew up. Methinks something's wrong with the
>> fixmap. Is it possible that we're crossing a PMD boundary and failing
>> to translate the addresses right?
>
> I might be that. We crash when the PKMAP_BASE is just after the FIX_WP_TEST.
>
> I will continue testing couple scenarios and design a fix. Moving the
> GDT FIXMAP at the beginning or align the base (or pad the end).
>
Talk about barking up the wrong tree...
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index f8e22dbad86c..c564f62c7a8d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -462,7 +464,8 @@ pgprot_t pg_fixmap_gdt_flags = PAGE_KERNEL;
static inline void setup_fixmap_gdt(int cpu)
{
__set_fixmap(get_cpu_gdt_ro_index(cpu),
- __pa(get_cpu_gdt_rw(cpu)), pg_fixmap_gdt_flags);
+ slow_virt_to_phys(get_cpu_gdt_rw(cpu)),
+ pg_fixmap_gdt_flags);
}
/* Load the original GDT from the per-cpu structure */
This makes UP boot for me, but SMP (2 cpus) is still busted.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2017-03-21 19:30 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2017-03-21 20:30 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2017-03-21 21:30 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-03-21 22:20 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-03-21 23:40 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-03-22 01:10 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2017-03-22 01:50 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-03-22 05:50 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2017-03-22 06:20 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-03-22 08:40 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-03-22 17:40 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2017-03-22 17:50 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-03-22 18:10 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-03-21 20:30 +0100
csiph-web