Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1604147
| From | Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: trivial code cleanup for memory_map_top_doown() |
| Date | 2017-03-20 03:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tmVf4-6oi-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tbRRv-5tj-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tkDmh-4GD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tkLMR-2GV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, Borislav
Do you still have some concern on this change?
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:56:39AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 07:50:21PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:30:33PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> In case (last_start <= step_size), start is for sure to be 0. So, it is
>>
>
>Hmm, I may write it more specific:
>
>"start" is for sure to be set to 0 with round_down(last_start - 1, step_size).
>
>>Well, lemme see:
>>
>>[ 0.000000] memory_map_top_down: entry, [0x100000:0x7ffdf000)
>>[ 0.000000] memory_map_top_down: addr: 0x7fc00000, real_end: 0x7fe00000
>>[ 0.000000] memory_map_top_down: last_start: 0x40000000 <= step_size: 0x2000000000, start: 0x40000000
>> ^^^^^^^^^^
>>It doesn't look like 0 to me.
>>
>>---
>>diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>>index 2193799ca800..d3b02a416df3 100644
>>--- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>>+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>>@@ -527,8 +531,13 @@ static void __init memory_map_top_down(unsigned long map_start,
>> start = round_down(last_start - 1, step_size);
>> if (start < map_start)
>> start = map_start;
>>- } else
>>+ } else {
>>+ pr_info("%s: last_start: 0x%lx <= step_size: 0x%lx, start: 0x%lx\n",
>>+ __func__, last_start, step_size, start);
>>+
>
>If you change this log with the following
>
> pr_err("%s: last_start: 0x%lx <= step_size: 0x%lx, start: 0x%lx\n",
> __func__, last_start, step_size,
> round_down(last_start - 1, step_size));
>
>You could see after calculation, start is 0 when (last_start <= step_size).
>
>--
>Wei Yang
>Help you, Help me
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: trivial code cleanup for memory_map_top_doown() Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 05:00 +0100 Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: trivial code cleanup for memory_map_top_doown() Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 03:30 +0100
csiph-web