Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1604142

Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi

From Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi
Date 2017-03-20 03:20 +0100
Message-ID <tmV5n-6kV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <tj31v-3pp-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tksKe-5zs-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tlD0S-6Rt-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tlPOp-7wu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tm0gO-77w-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 03/17/17 at 01:32pm, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar, at 10:09:51AM, Dave Young wrote:
> > 
> > Matt, I think it should be fine although I think the md type checking in
> > efi_mem_desc_lookup() is causing confusion and not easy to understand..
>  
> Could you make that a separate patch if you think of improvements
> there?

Duplicate the lookup function is indeed a little ugly, will do it when I
have a better idea, we can leave it as is since it works.

> 
> > How about move the if chunk early like below because it seems no need
> > to sanity check the addr + size any more if the md is still RUNTIME?
> 
> My original version did as you suggest, but I changed it because we
> *really* want to know if someone tries to reserve a range that spans
> regions. That would be totally unexpected and a warning about a
> potential bug/issue.

Matt, I'm fine if you prefer to capture the range checking errors.
Would you like me to post it or just you send it out?

Thanks
Dave

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2017-03-16 13:50 +0100
  Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> - 2017-03-16 19:00 +0100
  Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2017-03-17 03:30 +0100
    Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-03-17 14:30 +0100
    Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2017-03-17 14:40 +0100
      Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2017-03-20 03:20 +0100
        Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2017-03-21 08:50 +0100
          Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-03-22 17:20 +0100
            Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2017-03-23 03:50 +0100

csiph-web