Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1604029
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] mm: sub-section memory hotplug support |
| Date | 2017-03-19 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tmMlr-58-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tlwVr-2BJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tlHHc-1ID-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tlIWB-2Na-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu 16-03-17 12:04:48, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I didn't get to look through the patch series yet and I might not be > > able before LSF/MM. How urgent is this? I am primarily asking because > > the memory hotplug is really convoluted right now and putting more on > > top doesn't really sound like the thing we really want. I have tried to > > simplify the code [1] already but this is an early stage work so I do > > not want to impose any burden on you. So I am wondering whether this > > is something that needs to be merged very soon or it can wait for the > > rework and hopefully end up being much simpler in the end as well. > > > > What do you think? > > In general, I think it's better to add new features after > reworks/cleanup, but it's not clear to me (yet) that the problem you > are trying to solve makes this sub-section enabling for ZONE_DEVICE > any simpler. > > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170315091347.GA32626@dhcp22.suse.cz > > ZONE_DEVICE pages are never "online". The patch says "Instead we do > page->zone association from move_pfn_range which is called from > online_pages." which means the new scheme currently doesn't comprehend > the sprinkled ZONE_DEVICE hacks in the memory hotplug code. I hope we can get rid of those... > However, that said, I might take a look at whether the hacks belong in > the auto-online code so that we can share the delayed zone > initialization, but still skip marking the memory online per the > expectations of ZONE_DEVICE. I think this should be trivial. AFAIU it should be sufficient to split my move_pfn_range into online_pfn_range which would do the MMOP_ONLINE* handling and the real move_pfn_range which would do the zone specific association. Your devm_memremap_pages would then call this move_pfn_range after arch_add_memory. Or am I overlooking something? I would still have to addapt your changes to remove hardcoded section aligned expectations but that shouldn't be a big problem I guess. I still haven't looked into those deeply to fully understand them. > I expect it would be confusing to have > memblock devices in sysfs for ranges that can't be marked online? Well, if their only valid_zone would be ZONE_DEVICE then I believe it shouldn't be confusing much. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v4 00/13] mm: sub-section memory hotplug support Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 07/13] mm: fix register_new_memory() zone type detection Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 10/13] mm: prepare for hot-{add, remove} of sub-section ranges Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 06/13] mm: track active portions of a section at boot Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 12/13] mm: enable section-unaligned devm_memremap_pages() Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 11/13] mm: support section-unaligned ZONE_DEVICE memory ranges Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 05/13] mm: cleanup sparse_init_one_section() return value Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 01/13] mm: fix type width of section to/from pfn conversion macros Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 09/13] mm: convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap() Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 02/13] mm, devm_memremap_pages: use multi-order radix for ZONE_DEVICE lookups Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 03/13] mm: introduce struct mem_section_usage to track partial population of a section Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 04/13] mm: introduce common definitions for the size and mask of a section Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 13/13] libnvdimm, pfn, dax: stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 08/13] x86, kasan: clarify kasan's dependency on vmemmap_populate_hugepages() Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] mm: sub-section memory hotplug support Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-03-16 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] mm: sub-section memory hotplug support Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 20:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] mm: sub-section memory hotplug support Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-03-19 18:00 +0100
csiph-web