Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1604029

Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] mm: sub-section memory hotplug support

From Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] mm: sub-section memory hotplug support
Date 2017-03-19 18:00 +0100
Message-ID <tmMlr-58-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tlwVr-2BJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tlHHc-1ID-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tlIWB-2Na-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu 16-03-17 12:04:48, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I didn't get to look through the patch series yet and I might not be
> > able before LSF/MM. How urgent is this? I am primarily asking because
> > the memory hotplug is really convoluted right now and putting more on
> > top doesn't really sound like the thing we really want. I have tried to
> > simplify the code [1] already but this is an early stage work so I do
> > not want to impose any burden on you. So I am wondering whether this
> > is something that needs to be merged very soon or it can wait for the
> > rework and hopefully end up being much simpler in the end as well.
> >
> > What do you think?
> 
> In general, I think it's better to add new features after
> reworks/cleanup, but it's not clear to me (yet) that the problem you
> are trying to solve makes this sub-section enabling for ZONE_DEVICE
> any simpler.
> 
> > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170315091347.GA32626@dhcp22.suse.cz
> 
> ZONE_DEVICE pages are never "online". The patch says "Instead we do
> page->zone association from move_pfn_range which is called from
> online_pages." which means the new scheme currently doesn't comprehend
> the sprinkled ZONE_DEVICE hacks in the memory hotplug code.

I hope we can get rid of those...
 
> However, that said, I might take a look at whether the hacks belong in
> the auto-online code so that we can share the delayed zone
> initialization, but still skip marking the memory online per the
> expectations of ZONE_DEVICE.

I think this should be trivial. AFAIU it should be sufficient to split
my move_pfn_range into online_pfn_range which would do the MMOP_ONLINE*
handling and the real move_pfn_range which would do the zone specific
association. Your devm_memremap_pages would then call this
move_pfn_range after arch_add_memory. Or am I overlooking something?

I would still have to addapt your changes to remove hardcoded section
aligned expectations but that shouldn't be a big problem I guess. I
still haven't looked into those deeply to fully understand them.

> I expect it would be confusing to have
> memblock devices in sysfs for ranges that can't be marked online?

Well, if their only valid_zone would be ZONE_DEVICE then I believe it
shouldn't be confusing much.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v4 00/13] mm: sub-section memory hotplug support Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 07/13] mm: fix register_new_memory() zone type detection Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 10/13] mm: prepare for hot-{add,  remove} of sub-section ranges Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 06/13] mm: track active portions of a section at boot Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 12/13] mm: enable section-unaligned devm_memremap_pages() Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 11/13] mm: support section-unaligned ZONE_DEVICE memory  ranges Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 05/13] mm: cleanup sparse_init_one_section() return value Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 01/13] mm: fix type width of section to/from pfn  conversion macros Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 09/13] mm: convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to  populate_section_memmap() Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 02/13] mm,  devm_memremap_pages: use multi-order radix for ZONE_DEVICE lookups Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 03/13] mm: introduce struct mem_section_usage to track  partial population of a section Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 04/13] mm: introduce common definitions for the size and  mask of a section Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 13/13] libnvdimm, pfn,  dax: stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 08/13] x86,  kasan: clarify kasan's dependency on vmemmap_populate_hugepages() Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 07:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] mm: sub-section memory hotplug support Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-03-16 18:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] mm: sub-section memory hotplug support Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-03-16 20:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] mm: sub-section memory hotplug support Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-03-19 18:00 +0100

csiph-web