Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1603969

[PATCH v5] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor code

Show all headers | View raw

The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_* modes.

In this driver, mlock was being used to protect hardware state
changes. Replace it with buf_lock in the devices global data.

As buf_lock protects both the adis16060_spi_write() and
adis16060_spi_read() functions and both are always called in
pair. First write, then read. Thus, refactor the code to have
one single function adis16060_spi_write_than_read() which is
protected by the existing buf_lock.

Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
---

 v5:
   -Rename val in adis16060_spi_write_than_read() to conf.
   -Rename val2 in adis16060_spi_write_than_read() to val.
   -Corrected Checkpatch issues.
   -Removed goto from adis16060_read_raw().
    

 drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c | 42 ++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c b/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
index c9d46e7..0f12492 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
@@ -40,25 +40,20 @@ struct adis16060_state {
 
 static struct iio_dev *adis16060_iio_dev;
 
-static int adis16060_spi_write(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u8 val)
+static int adis16060_spi_write_than_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
+					 u8 conf, u16 *val)
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct adis16060_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
 
 	mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
-	st->buf[2] = val; /* The last 8 bits clocked in are latched */
+	st->buf[2] = conf; /* The last 8 bits clocked in are latched */
 	ret = spi_write(st->us_w, st->buf, 3);
-	mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
 
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static int adis16060_spi_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u16 *val)
-{
-	int ret;
-	struct adis16060_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
-
-	mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
 	ret = spi_read(st->us_r, st->buf, 3);
 
@@ -69,8 +64,8 @@ static int adis16060_spi_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u16 *val)
 	 */
 	if (!ret)
 		*val = ((st->buf[0] & 0x3) << 12) |
-			(st->buf[1] << 4) |
-			((st->buf[2] >> 4) & 0xF);
+			 (st->buf[1] << 4) |
+			 ((st->buf[2] >> 4) & 0xF);
 	mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -83,20 +78,19 @@ static int adis16060_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 {
 	u16 tval = 0;
 	int ret;
+	struct adis16060_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
 
 	switch (mask) {
 	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
 		/* Take the iio_dev status lock */
-		mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
-		ret = adis16060_spi_write(indio_dev, chan->address);
+		mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
+		ret = adis16060_spi_write_than_read(indio_dev,
+						    chan->address, &tval);
 		if (ret < 0)
-			goto out_unlock;
+			mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
+			return ret;
 
-		ret = adis16060_spi_read(indio_dev, &tval);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			goto out_unlock;
-
-		mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
+		mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
 		*val = tval;
 		return IIO_VAL_INT;
 	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:
@@ -110,10 +104,6 @@ static int adis16060_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 	}
 
 	return -EINVAL;
-
-out_unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
-	return ret;
 }
 
 static const struct iio_info adis16060_info = {
-- 
2.7.4

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v5] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor code simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 14:00 +0100
  Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v5] staging: Use buf_lock instead of  mlock and Refactor code Gargi Sharma <gs051095@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 18:20 +0100
    Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v5] staging: Use buf_lock instead of  mlock and Refactor code Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2017-03-19 21:50 +0100
      Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v5] staging: Use buf_lock instead of  mlock and Refactor code SIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 22:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v5] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor code SIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 16:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v5] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor  code Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2017-03-21 20:40 +0100

csiph-web