Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1603441
| From | Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: UML not maintained anymore? |
| Date | 2017-03-17 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tm2Vj-Og-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tfSOZ-6Wr-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Tue 2017-02-28 16:28:11, Natale Patriciello wrote: > It seems there is no interest in fixing bugs (such as [1]). Moreover, > same guest filesystem (same host os, distribution, etc.) on two > different machines (i7-2630 the first, i7-7700HQ the second) yield > different results, with crashes and corruption of filesystem in the > modern computer. So, can I consider UML as a legacy thing in the Linux > kernel? With what I can replace it (I'm doing TCP research, and I focus > on the networking stack)? Well.. if it worked before and does not work now, that's a regression and will be fixed. Bisect would be useful. If it never worked on new CPUs, that's different situation... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: UML not maintained anymore? Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-03-17 17:30 +0100 Re: UML not maintained anymore? Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 18:30 +0100
csiph-web