Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1601628
| From | Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] pinctrl: rockchip: PREEMPT_RT_FULL fixes |
| Date | 2017-03-15 19:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tllQm-32M-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tkD2V-4vZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tlh0l-89N-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:12:39PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:38 PM, John Keeping <john@metanate.com> wrote: > > > As described in Documentation/gpio/driver.txt, we should not be using > > sleepable APIs in the irqchip implementation. Since this includes the > > regmap API, this patch series ends up moving the mux setup for IRQs into > > an irq_bus_sync_unlock() handler which may result in the IRQ being > > configured before the port has been muxed as a GPIO. > > > > I've marked the series as RFC because I'm not sure if this is the best > > way to accomplish this or if there is another approach that is cleaner. > > Also, the first patch may not be correct on RK3399 because I originally > > wrote the patch for RK3288 on top of v4.4 where all drive updates only > > affect a single register. We don't need locking in this case because > > regmap_update_bits() takes a lock on the regmap internally, but if these > > two registers need to be updated atomically then another lock will > > be required here - slock cannot be used if it is converted to a raw > > spinlock since with full RT preemption the regmap's spinlock may sleep. > > Nice work! It all looks good to me, let's see what Heiko says. > > Please keep Julia Cartwright on the CC for this patch series, she is > doing some coccinelle-based rewrites to use raw spinlocks as we > speak, and she knows this stuff. > > She has not targeted the Rockchip driver yet, I guess because of > its complexity. I haven't really given much thought to how we might generically solve raw_spinlock problems for those drivers which make of irq_chip_generic just yet. I don't imagine it would be too difficult, just more work. Thanks for the CC. Julia
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] pinctrl: rockchip: PREEMPT_RT_FULL fixes Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-03-15 14:20 +0100 Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] pinctrl: rockchip: PREEMPT_RT_FULL fixes Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> - 2017-03-15 19:30 +0100
csiph-web