Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1601456
| From | Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND 4/4] mfd: arizona: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout instead of hard coding it |
| Date | 2017-03-15 15:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tlips-wL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tj2yt-3cS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tj2yu-3cS-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tkY7o-3hF-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <tkZGa-4eI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tlg4h-7uK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:17:03PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Charles Keepax wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:07:04PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, 09 Mar 2017, Charles Keepax wrote: > > > > > > > arizona_poll_reg essentially hard-codes regmap_read_poll_timeout, this > > > > patch updates the implementation to use regmap_read_poll_timeout. We > > > > still keep arizona_poll_reg around as regmap_read_poll_timeout is a > > > > macro so rather than expand this for each caller keep it wrapped in > > > > arizona_poll_reg. > > > > > > > > Whilst we are doing this make the timeouts a little more generous as the > > > > previous system had a bit more slack as it was done as a delay per > > > > iteration of the loop whereas regmap_read_poll_timeout compares ktime's. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++------------------------ > > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > > > > > Apart from patch count, is there any technical reason why this patch > > > shouldn't just be rolled into patch 3? > > > > > > > I prefer it as two patches as its clearer what happened from the > > history. One patch changes the interface for the function, the > > other updates the implementation. Can squash if you feel strongly > > about it though? > > I don't feel that strongly about it, but to me it looks like patch 4 > reworks everything patch 3 did. > I will spin a new version and squash them. Thanks, Charles
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH RESEND 4/4] mfd: arizona: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout instead of hard coding it Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-03-14 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND 4/4] mfd: arizona: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout instead of hard coding it Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> - 2017-03-14 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND 4/4] mfd: arizona: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout instead of hard coding it Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-03-15 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND 4/4] mfd: arizona: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout instead of hard coding it Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> - 2017-03-15 15:50 +0100
csiph-web