Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1602290
| From | "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] perf report: Show inline stack |
| Date | 2017-03-16 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tlDWW-7vw-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tgLs6-2V8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tleca-6cz-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Wolff, Thanks so much for your review comments! I just send out the v5 patch series. The patch series are updated according to your comments. Thanks Jin Yao On 3/14/2017 8:59 PM, Milian Wolff wrote: > On Friday, March 3, 2017 11:43:00 AM CET Jin Yao wrote: >> v4: Remove the options "--inline-line" and "--inline-name". Just use >> a new option "--inline" to print the inline function information. >> The policy is if the inline function name can be resolved then >> print the name in priority. If the name can't be resolved, then >> print the source line number. > This is still wrong from a usability POV. I may want to see the file/line for > entry that have a name. And actually, there are afaik no situations where you > could have a file/line but not a symbol name. > > Again, why don't you align this with the other non-inlined frames, and honor > the grouping setting? Check whether we group by address (then display file/ > line), or by function (then display the function name). > > Bye
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] perf report: Show inline stack Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> - 2017-03-15 11:20 +0100 Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] perf report: Show inline stack "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-16 14:50 +0100
csiph-web