Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1599457
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] lockdep: call trace_hardirqs_off after clearing hardirqs_enabled |
| Date | 2017-03-13 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tkziH-1PZ-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tkvf3-7vi-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Thanks for Cc'ing me.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 06:08:48PM +0800, Qi Hou wrote:
> The current order of calls within trace_hardirqs_off() would provoke an
> "unannotated irqs-off" WARNING.
>
> This warning was reported by check_flags() when it found that the hardirqs has
> been disabled but the irq-flags state, hardirqs_enabled, has not been cleared.
>
> Check_flags() is called via trace_hardirqs_off(), and trace_hardirqs_off() will
> be called by functions kind of local_irq_disable() if CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS has
> been enabled.
>
> The calltrace from functions kind of local_irq_diasble() to check_flags()
> simplied as below:
>
> local_irq_disable()
> |- trace_hardirqs_off()
> |- trace_hardirqs_off_caller()
> |- preemptirqsoff_hist()
> |- __DO_TRACE()
> |- rcu_dereference_sched()
> |- rcu_read_lock_sched_held()
> |- lock_is_held()
> |- check_flags()
>
> The order of calls within trace_hardirqs_off() can be simplified as below:
>
> local_irq_disable()
> |- raw_local_irq_disable()
> |- trace_hardirqs_off()
> |- trace_hardirqs_off() --> check_flags()
> |- hardirqs_enabled = 0
>
> We could find that the call to check_flags() has been made between disabling
> hardirqs and clearing hardirqs_enabled. That will definitely cause an
> "unannotated irqs-off" warning.
>
> To fix this "unannotated irqs-off" warning, we must call trace_hardirqs_off()
> after that we clear hardirqs_enabled.
Here you say: "trace_hardirqs_off()"
> Signed-off-by: Qi Hou <qi.hou@windriver.com>
> ---
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index 577f026..e8b35e4 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -2627,8 +2627,6 @@ __visible void trace_hardirqs_off_caller(unsigned long ip)
> {
> struct task_struct *curr = current;
>
> - time_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0, ip);
This is: "TIME_hardirqs_off()", notice the difference?
Care to try to write a changelog that makes sense?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] lockdep: call trace_hardirqs_off after clearing hardirqs_enabled Qi Hou <qi.hou@windriver.com> - 2017-03-13 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] lockdep: call trace_hardirqs_off after clearing hardirqs_enabled Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-03-13 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] lockdep: call trace_hardirqs_off after clearing hardirqs_enabled qhou <qi.hou@windriver.com> - 2017-03-14 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] lockdep: call trace_hardirqs_off after clearing hardirqs_enabled Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-13 15:40 +0100
csiph-web