Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1600121

Re: [PATCH] genirq: Fix handle_nested_irq() for IRQF_SHARED

From Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] genirq: Fix handle_nested_irq() for IRQF_SHARED
Date 2017-03-14 09:40 +0100
Message-ID <tkQ9Q-5Sw-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tkIYF-EG-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Tony Lindgren wrote:

> Shared interrupts can be registered with handle_nested_irq(), but
> currently only one of the registered handlers gets called.
> 
> The use of shared interrupts with handle_nested_irq() is probably rare,
> but at least a case of a shared VBUS interrupt between USB PHY and
> battery charger drivers for a PMIC makes sense.
> 
> Typically for_each_action_of_desc() gets called via handle_irq_event()
> at _handle_irq_event_percpu(), but handle_nested_irq() is different
> because of it's dummy irq_nested_primary_handler().
> 
> Let's fix the issue by calling the handler for all the entries in
> the action list.
>
> Fixes: 399b5da29b9f ("genirq: Support nested threaded irq handling")

It's not a fix, it's an extension. The nested facility was not meant to
handle shared interrupts in the first place. I really hope that hardware
folks finally understand that irq sharing is crap and broken...

> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
>  kernel/irq/chip.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -348,9 +348,11 @@ void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq)
>  	irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS);
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
>  
> -	action_ret = action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);
> -	if (!noirqdebug)
> -		note_interrupt(desc, action_ret);
> +	for_each_action_of_desc(desc, action) {
> +		action_ret = action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);
> +		if (!noirqdebug)
> +			note_interrupt(desc, action_ret);

This is wrong. See how __handle_irq_event_percpu() does this. But no need
to resend. See:

http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488904098-5350-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com

Thanks,

	tglx

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] genirq: Fix handle_nested_irq() for IRQF_SHARED Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-03-14 02:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] genirq: Fix handle_nested_irq() for IRQF_SHARED Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-03-14 09:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] genirq: Fix handle_nested_irq() for IRQF_SHARED Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-03-14 16:00 +0100

csiph-web