Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1598535
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] statx: optimize copy of struct statx to userspace |
| Date | 2017-03-12 03:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tk1Al-3lE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tjX3H-fX-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tk0uB-2J5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tk1h0-3eX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 06:16:55PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > Hi Al, > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 01:24:15AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 01:45:55PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> > > > > > > I found that statx() was significantly slower than stat(). As a > > > microbenchmark, I compared 10,000,000 invocations of fstat() on a tmpfs > > > file to the same with statx() passed a NULL path: > > > > Umm... > > > > Well, it's a silly benchmark, but stat performance is important, and usually > things are cached already so most of the time is just overhead --- which this > measures. And since nothing actually uses statx() yet, you can't do a benchmark > just by running some command like 'git status' or whatever. Oh, I agree that multiple __put_user() are wrong; I also agree that bulk copy is the right approach (when we get the unsafe stuff right, we can revisit that, but I suspect that on quite a few architectures a bulk copy will still give better time, no matter what). > If padding is a concern at all (AFAICS it's not actually an issue now with > struct statx, but people tend to have different opinions on how careful they > want to be with padding), then I think we'll just have to start by memsetting > the whole struct to 0. My point is simply that it's worth a comment in that code.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2] statx: optimize copy of struct statx to userspace Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 22:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] statx: optimize copy of struct statx to userspace Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-03-12 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] statx: optimize copy of struct statx to userspace Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] statx: optimize copy of struct statx to userspace Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-03-12 03:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] statx: optimize copy of struct statx to userspace Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 05:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] statx: optimize copy of struct statx to userspace Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 07:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] statx: optimize copy of struct statx to userspace Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> - 2017-03-13 05:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] statx: optimize copy of struct statx to userspace Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> - 2017-03-13 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] statx: optimize copy of struct statx to userspace Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 19:20 +0100
csiph-web