Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1596958
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: qoriq: enhance bus frequency calculation |
| Date | 2017-03-10 11:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tjpEJ-2rf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tj2RQ-3lW-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <tj2RQ-3lW-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tjhQS-4Yq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10-03-17, 01:44, Andy Tang wrote:
> > Will this always work? If yes, then what about dropping the code parsing DT
> > completely ? That is, just rely on clk_get_rate() in all cases.
> >
> We put all the clock tree configuration in driver, not in dts.
> cg-pll0-div1 is hardcoded in driver since we don't depend on dts.
> We kind of don't have other choices but use the hardcode clock name
> here too.
Looks like you misread my comment. Let me try again. Will it be fine
to write get_bus_freq() this way?
static u32 get_bus_freq(void)
{
struct clk *pltclk;
/* get platform freq by its clock name */
pltclk = clk_get(NULL, "cg-pll0-div1");
if (IS_ERR(pltclk)) {
pr_err("%s: can't get bus frequency %ld\n",
__func__, PTR_ERR(pltclk));
return PTR_ERR(pltclk);
}
return clk_get_rate(pltclk);
}
--
viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: qoriq: enhance bus frequency calculation Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-09 10:50 +0100
RE: [PATCH] cpufreq: qoriq: enhance bus frequency calculation Andy Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com> - 2017-03-10 02:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: qoriq: enhance bus frequency calculation Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-10 11:10 +0100
RE: [PATCH] cpufreq: qoriq: enhance bus frequency calculation Andy Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com> - 2017-03-10 11:20 +0100
csiph-web