Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1596383

Re: outreachy

From Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: outreachy
Date 2017-03-09 22:00 +0100
Message-ID <tjdkd-1Wq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tjd0R-1Nu-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Julia,

On 17-03-09 12:36 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I discussed the issue of outreachy patches for bcm with Greg, and we are
> not convinced that not having the patches CCd to you is such a good idea.
> While we don't want to spam you with noise, some of the applicants are
> starting to make more significant changes that it could be useful for you
> to be aware of.
>
> Could we try a compromise where you are not CCd on whitespace patches, but
> you are CCd on patches that actually modify the code?
All I'm asking is you work through your outreachy patches internal first 
to get rid of the most basic mistakes and email traffic it is geerating. 
  Once that learning process is through then they can be sent out like 
any other patches to the kernel mailing lists and maintainers.
>
> thanks,
> julia
>

Thanks,
Scott

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

outreachy Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2017-03-09 21:40 +0100
  Re: outreachy Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com> - 2017-03-09 22:00 +0100
    Re: outreachy Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> - 2017-03-09 22:00 +0100
      Re: outreachy Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-03-09 22:40 +0100
        Re: outreachy Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 23:20 +0100
          Re: outreachy Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-03-10 07:10 +0100

csiph-web