Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.11

From	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.11
Date	2017-03-11 17:10 +0100
Message-ID	<tjRKF-5bh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tjrZV-3ZN-69@gated-at.bofh.it> <tjxiV-7Ku-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Linus,

> You added an extra revert, only to pull in the *exact* same patch. WTF?

The patch I reverted had a broken, typoed Signed-off. My rationale was
to have only a proper one, and not two different ones coming from
different trees. Looks like I misjudged, sorry.

> Please stop this kind of stupidity. Now I have that unnecessary revert
> with a misleading commit log in my tree, in addition to that stupid
> merge that has no explanation and just reinstates the exact same thing
> you reverted.

I see your point.

> And talking about that merge I will repeat this one more time: merges
> are commits too. You had damn well add explanations for what a merge
> merges and why it is done.

Understood. Peter joined as co-maintainer kind of recently, and I guess
it shows that I didn't have to pass on merges a lot so far. It is not
that I ignored your preferences for merges (which make total sense to
me), I just missed to check how to properly do it. Will improve!

Regards,

   Wolfram

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.11 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2017-03-10 13:40 +0100
  Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.11 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-03-10 19:20 +0100
    Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.11 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2017-03-11 17:10 +0100

csiph-web