Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1594172
| From | Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour |
| Date | 2017-03-07 13:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <timpA-7rg-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tgUlI-13r-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ti7TA-5e3-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tilaa-6G6-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Felipe, On Tuesday 07 Mar 2017 12:57:40 Felipe Balbi wrote: > Laurent Pinchart writes: > > On Friday 03 Mar 2017 13:17:15 Roger Quadros wrote: > >> On alternate setting change, webcam gadget sends us a UVC_EVENT_STREAMON > >> or UVC_EVENT_STREAMOFF event. It expects delayed status response on > >> STREAMON event only but doesn't expect us to send that response over USB. > >> It sends the delayed response when we issue the VIDIOC_STREAMON ioctl. > >> > >> So we must not send UVCIOC_SEND_RESPONSE ioctl in these cases that too > >> with invalid response length. > > > > The commit message only explains why we should not call > > UVCIOC_SEND_RESPONSE in response to a STREAMON event, but not why we > > shouldn't either in response to a STREAMOFF event. The patch is correct > > changing both, but I propose wording the above two paragraphs as follows. > > > > "uvc-gadget: Do not send Set Interface (alternate setting) response twice > > > > On alternate setting change, the webcam gadget sends us a > > UVC_EVENT_STREAMON or UVC_EVENT_STREAMOFF event. In the first case, the > > driver will issue a delayed status response automatically when we call > > the VIDIOC_STREAMON ioctl. In the second case, the driver sends the > > status response immediately. We must thus not send the status response > > manually with UVCIOC_SEND_RESPONSE in any of those cases." > > > > If you're fine with that I'll change the message when applying, there's no > > need to resend the patch. > > I have this in my testing/fixes and was planning to send it to Greg this > week. I can drop it from my queue, no problem, but then let me know as > you would need my acked-by. This is a userspace application patch. Feel free to send it to Greg, but I don't think he will know what to do with it :-) Were you maybe confusing this patch with the kernel fix that Roger sent a few days ago ? That one should be queued, please keep it in your tree. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-03-03 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2017-03-06 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com> - 2017-03-06 15:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> - 2017-03-06 22:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-03-07 09:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2017-03-07 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> - 2017-03-07 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2017-03-07 14:00 +0100
csiph-web