Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1594172

Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour

From Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour
Date 2017-03-07 13:30 +0100
Message-ID <timpA-7rg-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tgUlI-13r-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ti7TA-5e3-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tilaa-6G6-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Felipe,

On Tuesday 07 Mar 2017 12:57:40 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Laurent Pinchart writes:
> > On Friday 03 Mar 2017 13:17:15 Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> On alternate setting change, webcam gadget sends us a UVC_EVENT_STREAMON
> >> or UVC_EVENT_STREAMOFF event. It expects delayed status response on
> >> STREAMON event only but doesn't expect us to send that response over USB.
> >> It sends the delayed response when we issue the VIDIOC_STREAMON ioctl.
> >> 
> >> So we must not send UVCIOC_SEND_RESPONSE ioctl in these cases that too
> >> with invalid response length.
> > 
> > The commit message only explains why we should not call
> > UVCIOC_SEND_RESPONSE in response to a STREAMON event, but not why we
> > shouldn't either in response to a STREAMOFF event. The patch is correct
> > changing both, but I propose wording the above two paragraphs as follows.
> > 
> > "uvc-gadget: Do not send Set Interface (alternate setting) response twice
> > 
> > On alternate setting change, the webcam gadget sends us a
> > UVC_EVENT_STREAMON or UVC_EVENT_STREAMOFF event. In the first case, the
> > driver will issue a delayed status response automatically when we call
> > the VIDIOC_STREAMON ioctl. In the second case, the driver sends the
> > status response immediately. We must thus not send the status response
> > manually with UVCIOC_SEND_RESPONSE in any of those cases."
> > 
> > If you're fine with that I'll change the message when applying, there's no
> > need to resend the patch.
> 
> I have this in my testing/fixes and was planning to send it to Greg this
> week. I can drop it from my queue, no problem, but then let me know as
> you would need my acked-by.

This is a userspace application patch. Feel free to send it to Greg, but I 
don't think he will know what to do with it :-) Were you maybe confusing this 
patch with the kernel fix that Roger sent a few days ago ? That one should be 
queued, please keep it in your tree.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-03-03 13:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2017-03-06 15:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting)  response behaviour Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com> - 2017-03-06 15:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> - 2017-03-06 22:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting)  response behaviour Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-03-07 09:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2017-03-07 12:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> - 2017-03-07 13:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2017-03-07 14:00 +0100

csiph-web