Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1593975

Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow

Show all headers | View raw

2017-03-02 22:10 GMT+08:00 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> I was testing Daniel's changes with his test case, and tweaked it a
> little. Instead of having the runtime equal to the deadline, I
> increased the deadline ten fold.
>
> Daniel's test case had:
>
>         attr.sched_runtime  = 2 * 1000 * 1000;          /* 2 ms */
>         attr.sched_deadline = 2 * 1000 * 1000;          /* 2 ms */
>         attr.sched_period   = 2 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000;   /* 2 s */
>
> To make it more interesting, I changed it to:
>
>         attr.sched_runtime  =  2 * 1000 * 1000;         /* 2 ms */
>         attr.sched_deadline = 20 * 1000 * 1000;         /* 20 ms */
>         attr.sched_period   =  2 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000;  /* 2 s */
>
> The results were rather surprising. The behavior that Daniel's patch
> was fixing came back. The task started using much more than .1% of the
> CPU. More like 20%.
>
> Looking into this I found that it was due to the dl_entity_overflow()
> constantly returning true. That's because it uses the relative period
> against relative runtime vs the absolute deadline against absolute
> runtime.
>
>   runtime / (deadline - t) > dl_runtime / dl_period
>
> There's even a comment mentioning this, and saying that when relative
> deadline equals relative period, that the equation is the same as using
> deadline instead of period. That comment is backwards! What we really
> want is:
>
>   runtime / (deadline - t) > dl_runtime / dl_deadline
>
> We care about if the runtime can make its deadline, not its period. And
> then we can say "when the deadline equals the period, the equation is
> the same as using dl_period instead of dl_deadline".
>
> After correcting this, now when the task gets enqueued, it can throttle
> correctly, and Daniel's fix to the throttling of sleeping deadline
> tasks works even when the runtime and deadline are not the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
> Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
> Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> Cc: Romulo Silva de Oliveira <romulo.deoliveira@ufsc.br>
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---

Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>

>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index b669f7f..f7403e5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -445,13 +445,13 @@ static void replenish_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
>   *
>   * This function returns true if:
>   *
> - *   runtime / (deadline - t) > dl_runtime / dl_period ,
> + *   runtime / (deadline - t) > dl_runtime / dl_deadline ,
>   *
>   * IOW we can't recycle current parameters.
>   *
> - * Notice that the bandwidth check is done against the period. For
> + * Notice that the bandwidth check is done against the deadline. For
>   * task with deadline equal to period this is the same of using
> - * dl_deadline instead of dl_period in the equation above.
> + * dl_period instead of dl_deadline in the equation above.
>   */
>  static bool dl_entity_overflow(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
>                                struct sched_dl_entity *pi_se, u64 t)
> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static bool dl_entity_overflow(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
>          * of anything below microseconds resolution is actually fiction
>          * (but still we want to give the user that illusion >;).
>          */
> -       left = (pi_se->dl_period >> DL_SCALE) * (dl_se->runtime >> DL_SCALE);
> +       left = (pi_se->dl_deadline >> DL_SCALE) * (dl_se->runtime >> DL_SCALE);
>         right = ((dl_se->deadline - t) >> DL_SCALE) *
>                 (pi_se->dl_runtime >> DL_SCALE);
>
> --
> 2.9.3
>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH V4 3/3] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> - 2017-03-02 15:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period  when calculating overflow Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 09:30 +0100

csiph-web