Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1595304
| From | Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations |
| Date | 2017-03-08 16:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tiM0G-86-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <ti3PY-2mY-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <ti83f-5wO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tiLHj-8qM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tiLHj-8qM-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tiLHj-8qM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:27:11PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote: > > As in my other reply, I'd prefer that we wrapped the (arch-specific) > > atomic implementations such that we can instrument them explicitly in a > > core header. That means that the implementation and semantics of the > > atomics don't change at all. > > > > Note that we could initially do this just for x86 and arm64), e.g. by > > having those explicitly include an <asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h> > > at the end of their <asm/atomic.h>. > > How exactly do you want to do this incrementally? > I don't feel ready to shuffle all archs, but doing x86 in one patch > and then arm64 in another looks tractable. I guess we'd have three patches: one adding the header and any core infrastructure, followed by separate patches migrating arm64 and x86 over. Thanks, Mark.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-06 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-06 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-06 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-06 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-06 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-06 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-06 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-03-06 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-03-06 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-06 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-03-06 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-06 22:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-08 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-08 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-03-08 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-03-08 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-03-08 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-03-08 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-08 17:30 +0100
csiph-web