Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1592822
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: Aspeed AST2400/AST2500 ADC |
| Date | 2017-03-05 19:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <thILw-46d-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tfXlE-1rB-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfXlE-1rB-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tg0My-3uP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tg9mP-1zt-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgq4h-4Qm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 03/01/2017 07:29 PM, Rick Altherr wrote: > Resending in plain text. > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: >> On 02/28/2017 04:49 PM, Joel Stanley wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Rick Altherr <raltherr@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Aspeed AST2400/AST2500 BMC SoCs include a 16 channel, 10-bit ADC. This >>>> driver implements reading the ADC values, enabling channels via device >>>> tree, and optionally providing channel labels via device tree. Low and >>>> high threshold interrupts are supported by the hardware but not >>>> implemented. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rick Altherr <raltherr@google.com> >>> >>> >>> Looks good. Some minor comments below. >>> >>> Is there a reason you wrote a hwmon driver instead of an iio driver? I >>> wasn't sure what the recommended subsystem is. >> >> >> Excellent point. Question is really if there is a plan to add support for >> thresholds. If not, an iio driver might be more appropriate. >> >> Guenter >> > > The hardware supports firing interrupts on high and low thresholds. > I'm not planning to use that feature yet so I didn't implement it. > Would you prefer that I leave it as is (maybe with a TODO), implement > the thresholding, or change to iio? > Let's try to determine the intended use of the ADC. I don't find the datasheet online; all I can find is brief summaries which don't me tell much, but suggest that it is a general purpose ADC and not specifically intended for hardware monitoring. What is the minimum sampling rate ? That should give us an idea. If it is in the uS range, iio would be more appropriate (and the iio-hwmon bridge could be used if a channel is in fact used for hardware monitoring). Thanks, Guenter
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: Aspeed AST2400/AST2500 ADC Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-03-01 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: Aspeed AST2400/AST2500 ADC Rick Altherr <raltherr@google.com> - 2017-03-02 05:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: Aspeed AST2400/AST2500 ADC Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-03-05 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: Aspeed AST2400/AST2500 ADC Rick Altherr <raltherr@google.com> - 2017-03-08 01:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: Aspeed AST2400/AST2500 ADC Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-03-03 08:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: Aspeed AST2400/AST2500 ADC Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-03-05 17:20 +0100
csiph-web