Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1592192

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] remoteproc: qcom: Add scm call to protect modem mem in mss rproc drv.

From Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] remoteproc: qcom: Add scm call to protect modem mem in mss rproc drv.
Date 2017-03-03 19:30 +0100
Message-ID <th07M-556-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t5hQK-2Xv-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5hQL-2Xv-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfKeJ-174-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <th07M-556-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 03/03, Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) wrote:
> On 2/28/2017 12:46 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >On 01/30, Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
> >>+		dest_info[i].vm = dest[i];
> >>+		dest_info[i].perm = perm[i];
> >Needs to do a cpu_to_le32() somewhere. Please run sparse.
> I understand that byte reordering needed but not sure what is sparse
> will check and do it.

http://git.kernel.org/cgit/devel/sparse/sparse.git/

> >
> >>+		dest_info[i].ctx = NULL;
> >>+		dest_info[i].ctx_size = 0;
> >>+	}
> >Perhaps we should just allocate these first (one or two elements
> >isn't a big difference) and then fill the details in directly.
> Not very clear what is ask here?
> >

I'm saying we could fill in dest_info in the case statement
instead of here in an up to 2 times loop.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] remoteproc: qcom: Add scm call to protect modem  mem in mss rproc drv. Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-03-03 19:30 +0100

csiph-web