Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1591082

Re: ARM64 perf stacktraces on tracepoint events

From Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: ARM64 perf stacktraces on tracepoint events
Date 2017-03-02 14:50 +0100
Message-ID <tgzhf-2VJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tgp8d-44Y-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Adding James, Takahiro-san, and Will, for stacktracing and arm64 perf]

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:42:17PM -0800, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 3.18 kernel running on an arm64 device, I tried running:
> perf record -a -g -e sched:sched_wakeup
> 
> I was expecting something like the output at:
> www.brendangregg.com/perf.html
> 
> But I don't see stacktraces, could I be missing any patches you could
> point me to?

I can't spot much obvious, looking at arm64's stacktrace.c and perf_callchain.c
since v3.18. There's commit:

  9702970c7bd3e2d6 (Revert "ARM64: unwind: Fix PC calculation")

... though that was Cc'd stable.

I can't immediately see why that would truncate unwinding, though I'm also not
sure how perf and ftrace interact here, so I may be missing something obvious.

> I do see stack traces if I do regular perf profiling
> (perf record -F 99 -a -g).

> Below is the output I get. Thanks for any insight into this.
> 
> Regards,
> Joel
> 
> sailfish:/data # ./perf report
>        # Samples: 22  of event 'sched:sched_wakeup'
> # Event count (approx.): 410333
> #
> # Children      Self  Trace output
> # ........  ........
> .............................................................
> #
>     61.29%    61.29%  comm=ksoftirqd/0 pid=3 prio=120 success=1 target_cpu=000
>             |
>             ---0
> 
>     33.25%    33.25%  comm=hw pid=12777 prio=120 success=1 target_cpu=002
>             |
>             ---0
> 
>      2.46%     2.46%  comm=kworker/u8:2 pid=12482 prio=120 success=1
> target_cpu=002
>             |
>             ---0
> 
>      1.39%     1.39%  comm=migration/2 pid=21 prio=0 success=1 target_cpu=002
>             |
>             ---0


FWIW, on a recent HEAD (86292b33d4b79ee0), I see reasonable looking backtraces,
e.g.

    77.48%     0.00%  swapper      [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] do_idle
            |
            ---do_idle
               |          
               |--68.84%--call_cpuidle
               |          cpuidle_enter
               |          cpuidle_enter_state
               |          |          
               |           --61.05%--el1_irq
               |                     gic_handle_irq
               |                     __handle_domain_irq
               |                     irq_exit
               |                     __do_softirq
               |                     |          
               |                     |--22.29%--run_timer_softirq


Thanks,
Mark.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

ARM64 perf stacktraces on tracepoint events Joel Fernandes <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 04:00 +0100
  Re: ARM64 perf stacktraces on tracepoint events Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-03-02 14:50 +0100
    Re: ARM64 perf stacktraces on tracepoint events Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com> - 2017-03-03 01:20 +0100

csiph-web