Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1590848

Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] drivers: perf: hisi: Handle counter overflow IRQ in MN PMU

From Anurup M <anurupvasu@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] drivers: perf: hisi: Handle counter overflow IRQ in MN PMU
Date 2017-03-02 06:30 +0100
Message-ID <tgrto-612-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tcESd-2tv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tcUki-41E-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdhgS-252-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdhqy-2nT-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <teeqB-2i0-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On Friday 24 February 2017 08:34 AM, Anurup M wrote:
>>>>> +static int hisi_mn_init_irqs_fdt(struct device *dev,
>>>>> +                struct hisi_pmu *mn_pmu)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    struct hisi_mn_data *mn_data = mn_pmu->hwmod_data;
>>>>> +    struct hisi_djtag_client *client = mn_data->client;
>>>>> +    int irq = -1, num_irqs, i;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    num_irqs = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
>>>> Surely we expect a specific number of interrupts?
>>>>
>>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < num_irqs; i++) {
>>>>> +        irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, i);
>>>>> +        if (irq < 0)
>>>>> +            dev_info(dev, "No IRQ resource!\n");
>>>>> +    }
>>>> Why are we throwing these away?
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    if (irq < 0)
>>>>> +        return 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    /* The last entry in the IRQ list to be chosen
>>>>> +     * This is as per mbigen-v2 IRQ mapping
>>>>> +     */
>>>>> +    return hisi_mn_init_irq(irq, mn_pmu, client);
>>>> I don't understand this comment.
>>>>
>>>> Why do we only use the list IRQ?
>>>>
>>>> What does this have to do with the mbigen?
>>>>
>>>> No ordering requirement was described in the DT binding.
>>> There is a defect in the mbigen hardware to handle the IRQ mapping
>>> for MN.
>>> Due to this the IRQ property
>>> of MN is made as a list and we read all IRQs and use only the last one.
>>> I shall mention it in the comment and also add note in the DT bindings.
>> You'll need to elaborate on that a bit further; I don't understand.
>>
>> If the interrupts aren't usable, there's arguably not much point listing
>> them in the DT.
>>
>> Regardless, the order of the list *must* be specified in the DT binding.
>
> I'm sorry for creating this confusion. It was a wrong workaround due 
> to my misunderstanding of the
> IRQ mapping.
> The MN will use a single IRQ for overflow in HiP07. I shall update it 
> and resend.
> But in HiP05/06 there is no support for this IRQ, So I shall modify to 
> use polling when IRQ is not available.
>

On further tests it is confirmed that the MN interrupt line is broken in 
hardware. so the driver
will only use poll method. I shall remove the IRQ support and resubmit 
adding poll method.

Thanks,
Anurup

> Thanks,
> Anurup
>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] drivers: perf: hisi: Handle counter overflow IRQ  in MN PMU Anurup M <anurupvasu@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 06:30 +0100

csiph-web