Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1590504

Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize pick_next_task for idle_sched_class too

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize pick_next_task for idle_sched_class too
Date 2017-03-01 17:50 +0100
Message-ID <tgfBT-5HN-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <te265-23e-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <te3lv-323-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgePw-5b2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgfix-5AK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgfix-5AK-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:19:22AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:03:52 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:53:03AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > Peter, do we have a solution for this yet? Are you going to add the one
> > > with the linker magic?  
> > 
> > I queued the below earlier today.
> 
> Isn't this pretty much identical to the patch I sent you a month ago?
> 
>   http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170119101703.2abeaeb6@gandalf.local.home

Yes, except this one has a comment explaining why we care about
prev->sched_class.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize pick_next_task for idle_sched_class too Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-03-01 17:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize pick_next_task for idle_sched_class too Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-03-01 17:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize pick_next_task for idle_sched_class too Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-01 17:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize pick_next_task for idle_sched_class too Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-01 17:50 +0100

csiph-web