Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1590426

Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt

From Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt
Date 2017-03-01 16:40 +0100
Message-ID <tgewb-4ZE-51@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <tfXF0-1ys-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tg87o-tP-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tg8TL-179-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgc1j-3bp-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgcb1-3ud-55@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 03/01/2017 02:04 PM, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 01:42 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> ...
> 
>> I can certainly understand if you don't wont to take the patch until
>> we have results with
>> dm-crypt itself but the difference between 8 separate invocation of
>> the engine for 512
>> bytes of XTS and a single invocation for 4KB are pretty big.
> 
> Yes, I know it. But the same can be achieved if we just implement
> 4k sector encryption in dmcrypt. It is incompatible with LUKS1
> (but next LUKS version will support it) but I think this is not
> a problem for now.
> 
> If the underlying device supports atomic write of 4k sectors, then
> there should not be a problem.
> 
> This is one of the speed-up I would like to compare with the IV approach,
> because everyone should benefit from 4k sectors in the end.
> And no crypto API changes are needed here.
> 
> (I have an old patch for this, so I will try to revive it.)

If anyone interested, simple experimental patch for larger sector size
(up to the page size) for dmcrypt is in this branch:

http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mbroz/linux.git/log/?h=dm-crypt-4k-sector

It would be nice to check what performance gain could be provided
by this simple approach.

Milan

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@linaro.org> - 2017-02-22 07:20 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 22:40 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> - 2017-03-01 09:50 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 10:40 +0100
        Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> - 2017-03-01 14:00 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 14:10 +0100
            Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 16:40 +0100
              Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> - 2017-03-06 15:40 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> - 2017-03-01 14:30 +0100
            Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> - 2017-03-02 15:10 +0100

csiph-web