Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1590426
| From | Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt |
| Date | 2017-03-01 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgewb-4ZE-51@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <tfXF0-1ys-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tg87o-tP-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tg8TL-179-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgc1j-3bp-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgcb1-3ud-55@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 03/01/2017 02:04 PM, Milan Broz wrote: > On 03/01/2017 01:42 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > ... > >> I can certainly understand if you don't wont to take the patch until >> we have results with >> dm-crypt itself but the difference between 8 separate invocation of >> the engine for 512 >> bytes of XTS and a single invocation for 4KB are pretty big. > > Yes, I know it. But the same can be achieved if we just implement > 4k sector encryption in dmcrypt. It is incompatible with LUKS1 > (but next LUKS version will support it) but I think this is not > a problem for now. > > If the underlying device supports atomic write of 4k sectors, then > there should not be a problem. > > This is one of the speed-up I would like to compare with the IV approach, > because everyone should benefit from 4k sectors in the end. > And no crypto API changes are needed here. > > (I have an old patch for this, so I will try to revive it.) If anyone interested, simple experimental patch for larger sector size (up to the page size) for dmcrypt is in this branch: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mbroz/linux.git/log/?h=dm-crypt-4k-sector It would be nice to check what performance gain could be provided by this simple approach. Milan
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@linaro.org> - 2017-02-22 07:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 22:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> - 2017-03-01 09:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 10:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> - 2017-03-01 14:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 14:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 16:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> - 2017-03-06 15:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> - 2017-03-01 14:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> - 2017-03-02 15:10 +0100
csiph-web