Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1591536

Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] llist: Provide a safe version for llist_for_each

From Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] llist: Provide a safe version for llist_for_each
Date 2017-03-03 00:10 +0100
Message-ID <tgI1c-KT-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <taFIJ-759-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <taFIJ-759-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <taG25-7dl-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 03:45:44PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> writes:
> 
> > Sometimes we have to dereference next field of llist node before entering
> > loop becasue the node might be deleted or the next field might be
> > modified within the loop. So this adds the safe version of llist_for_each,
> > that is, llist_for_each_safe.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>

Hello, Ingo and Peterz

Does this have some problems? My 9th patch in this thread should be
considered with this together. So could you check this?

> 
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
> 
> > ---
> >  include/linux/llist.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/llist.h b/include/linux/llist.h
> > index fd4ca0b..b90c9f2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/llist.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/llist.h
> > @@ -105,6 +105,25 @@ static inline void init_llist_head(struct llist_head *list)
> >  	for ((pos) = (node); pos; (pos) = (pos)->next)
> >  
> >  /**
> > + * llist_for_each_safe - iterate over some deleted entries of a lock-less list
> > + *			 safe against removal of list entry
> > + * @pos:	the &struct llist_node to use as a loop cursor
> > + * @n:		another &struct llist_node to use as temporary storage
> > + * @node:	the first entry of deleted list entries
> > + *
> > + * In general, some entries of the lock-less list can be traversed
> > + * safely only after being deleted from list, so start with an entry
> > + * instead of list head.
> > + *
> > + * If being used on entries deleted from lock-less list directly, the
> > + * traverse order is from the newest to the oldest added entry.  If
> > + * you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you must
> > + * reverse the order by yourself before traversing.
> > + */
> > +#define llist_for_each_safe(pos, n, node)			\
> > +	for ((pos) = (node); (pos) && ((n) = (pos)->next, true); (pos) = (n))
> > +
> > +/**
> >   * llist_for_each_entry - iterate over some deleted entries of lock-less list of given type
> >   * @pos:	the type * to use as a loop cursor.
> >   * @node:	the fist entry of deleted list entries.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] llist: Provide a safe version for llist_for_each Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-03-03 00:10 +0100

csiph-web