Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1591349
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/26] rewrite READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE |
| Date | 2017-03-02 19:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgDbb-5KR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tgCf7-56J-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgCf7-56J-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgCf8-56J-47@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Christian Borntraeger
<borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 05:38 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> This attempts a rewrite of the two macros, using a simpler implementation
>> for the most common case of having a naturally aligned 1, 2, 4, or (on
>> 64-bit architectures) 8 byte object that can be accessed with a single
>> instruction. For these, we go back to a volatile pointer dereference
>> that we had with the ACCESS_ONCE macro.
>
> We had changed that back then because gcc 4.6 and 4.7 had a bug that could
> removed the volatile statement on aggregate types like the following one
>
> union ipte_control {
> unsigned long val;
> struct {
> unsigned long k : 1;
> unsigned long kh : 31;
> unsigned long kg : 32;
> };
> };
>
> See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145
>
> If I see that right, your __ALIGNED_WORD(x)
> macro would say that for above structure sizeof(x) == sizeof(long)) is true,
> so it would fall back to the old volatile cast and might reintroduce the
> old compiler bug?
Ah, right, that's the missing piece. For some reason I didn't find
the reference in the source or the git log.
> Could you maybe you fence your simple macro for anything older than 4.9? After
> all there was no kasan support anyway on these older gcc version.
Yes, that should work, thanks!
Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 02/26] rewrite READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-03-02 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/26] rewrite READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2017-03-02 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/26] rewrite READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-03-02 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/26] rewrite READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-03-02 22:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/26] rewrite READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-03-03 14:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/26] rewrite READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2017-03-03 14:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/26] rewrite READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-03 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/26] rewrite READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-03 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/26] rewrite READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2017-03-03 04:20 +0100
csiph-web