Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1591185

Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: sunxi-ng: add support for PRCM CCUs

From Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: sunxi-ng: add support for PRCM CCUs
Date 2017-03-02 16:20 +0100
Message-ID <tgAGm-4bI-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tgAGm-4bI-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:22:13PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > I'm a bit worried by that to be honest. You claim to support the A31, 
> > yet jugdging by the current state of that code you never actually 
> > tested it on that SoC. 
> >
> > What makes you say that the PRCM clocks are the same for the H3 and 
> > A64? We have to be sure, otherwise we might not be able to get the DT 
> > binding right from the very beginning, and we might not be able to fix 
> > it later. 
> 
> In fact, if we worry about this, we shouldn't make r-ccu, as
> dedicated clocks are more easy to fix.
> 
> For newer SoCs' PRCM, we never have enough documents, and Allwinner
> have said that they cannot provide it. (I asked them for this.)
> 
> The best solution is to implement mature enough dedicated clocks
> before we convert to ccu.

What do you mean by dedicated clocks?

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: sunxi-ng: add support for PRCM CCUs Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-03-02 16:20 +0100
  Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: sunxi-ng: add support for  PRCM CCUs "maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-03-03 16:00 +0100

csiph-web