Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1591185
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: sunxi-ng: add support for PRCM CCUs |
| Date | 2017-03-02 16:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgAGm-4bI-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tgAGm-4bI-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:22:13PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > I'm a bit worried by that to be honest. You claim to support the A31, > > yet jugdging by the current state of that code you never actually > > tested it on that SoC. > > > > What makes you say that the PRCM clocks are the same for the H3 and > > A64? We have to be sure, otherwise we might not be able to get the DT > > binding right from the very beginning, and we might not be able to fix > > it later. > > In fact, if we worry about this, we shouldn't make r-ccu, as > dedicated clocks are more easy to fix. > > For newer SoCs' PRCM, we never have enough documents, and Allwinner > have said that they cannot provide it. (I asked them for this.) > > The best solution is to implement mature enough dedicated clocks > before we convert to ccu. What do you mean by dedicated clocks? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: sunxi-ng: add support for PRCM CCUs Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-03-02 16:20 +0100 Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: sunxi-ng: add support for PRCM CCUs "maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-03-03 16:00 +0100
csiph-web