Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1588768
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks |
| Date | 2017-02-27 16:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tfvIJ-7An-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tfqpI-45z-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfqpI-45z-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfrF8-4Ql-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon 27-02-17 12:25:10, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:02:09AM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > A couple of other thoughts: > > 1) Having all newly added memory online ASAP is probably what people > > want for all virtual machines. > > This is not true for s390. On s390 we have "standby" memory that a guest > sees and potentially may use if it sets it online. Every guest that sets > memory offline contributes to the hypervisor's standby memory pool, while > onlining standby memory takes memory away from the standby pool. > > The use-case is that a system administrator in advance knows the maximum > size a guest will ever have and also defines how much memory should be used > at boot time. The difference is standby memory. > > Auto-onlining of standby memory is the last thing we want. > > > Unfortunately, we have additional complexity with memory zones > > (ZONE_NORMAL, ZONE_MOVABLE) and in some cases manual intervention is > > required. Especially, when further unplug is expected. > > This also is a reason why auto-onlining doesn't seem be the best way. Can you imagine any situation when somebody actually might want to have this knob enabled? From what I understand it doesn't seem to be the case. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-27 11:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> - 2017-02-27 11:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-27 11:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> - 2017-02-27 12:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> - 2017-02-27 14:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-27 16:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2017-02-27 12:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> - 2017-02-27 13:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-27 16:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2017-02-28 14:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-27 19:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, hotplug: get rid of auto_online_blocks Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-02-28 00:40 +0100
csiph-web