Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1589761
| From | Jon Mason <jon.mason@broadcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: bcm5301x: Add TWD WD Support to DT |
| Date | 2017-02-28 21:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tfWSB-11X-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tfWSB-11X-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfWSB-11X-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfWSB-11X-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28 February 2017 at 21:31, Jon Mason <jon.mason@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> @@ -70,10 +70,19 @@
>> clocks = <&periph_clk>;
>> };
>>
>> - local-timer@20600 {
>> + timer@20600 {
>
> Is there a reason for this rename? I don't really have preference for
> any name, it's just we shouldn't keep renaming this depending of
> personal preferences.
>
> It also doesn't seem like adjusting to any schema:
> bcm63138.dtsi uses local-timer@1e600
> bcm-nsp.dtsi uses twd-timer@20600
> berlin2cd.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
> berlin2.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
> berlin2q.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
This was a suggestion from Sergei Shtylyov
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-December/395160.html
>
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-twd-timer";
>> - reg = <0x20600 0x100>;
>> - interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + reg = <0x20600 0x20>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) |
>> + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
>> + clocks = <&periph_clk>;
>> + };
>
> The rest looks OK, thanks! :)
>
> --
> Rafał
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: bcm5301x: Add TWD WD Support to DT Jon Mason <jon.mason@broadcom.com> - 2017-02-28 21:50 +0100 Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: bcm5301x: Add TWD WD Support to DT Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 22:20 +0100
csiph-web