Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1588278
| From | Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Recommended notation for OPP to avoid DTC warnings |
| Date | 2017-02-26 06:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <teZIR-2eX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi.
Decumentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
takes examples like this:
opp@1000000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
opp-microvolt = <970000 975000 985000>;
opp-microamp = <70000>;
clock-latency-ns = <300000>;
opp-suspend;
};
opp@1100000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1100000000>;
opp-microvolt = <980000 1000000 1010000>;
opp-microamp = <80000>;
clock-latency-ns = <310000>;
};
opp@1200000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
opp-microvolt = <1025000>;
clock-latency-ns = <290000>;
turbo-mode;
};
If we follow this notation and the device-tree is built with W=1,
DTC warns like follows:
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@1000000000 has a
unit name, but no reg property
Is there a recommended notation to avoid it?
Maybe, simply omit the "@" ?
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Recommended notation for OPP to avoid DTC warnings Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2017-02-26 06:40 +0100
Re: Recommended notation for OPP to avoid DTC warnings Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-27 05:20 +0100
Re: Recommended notation for OPP to avoid DTC warnings Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-02-27 12:00 +0100
Re: Recommended notation for OPP to avoid DTC warnings Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2017-02-27 12:00 +0100
Re: Recommended notation for OPP to avoid DTC warnings Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-27 12:30 +0100
csiph-web