Re: [GIT pull] x86/timers for 4.10

From	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [GIT pull] x86/timers for 4.10
Date	2017-02-23 14:40 +0100
Message-ID	<te1ML-1Qh-57@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <t8yV4-8fB-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8Aau-Kl-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8Ywa-7IY-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdWWK-76D-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdYOS-8mZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 11:26 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 09:20:06AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
> > @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ void check_tsc_sync_source(int cpu)
> >  > > 	> > if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST))
> >  > > 	> > 	> > atomic_set(&test_runs, 1);
> >  > > 	> > else
> > -> > 	> > 	> > atomic_set(&test_runs, 3);
> > +> > 	> > 	> > atomic_set(&test_runs, 5);
> 
> So
> 	> 	> atomic_set(&test_runs, max_t(unsigned int, 3, num_online_nodes() + 1));

I don't know that there is a correlation, ergo the "log" wording ;-)

	-Mike

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [GIT pull] x86/timers for 4.10 Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-02-23 09:30 +0100
  Re: [GIT pull] x86/timers for 4.10 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-23 10:20 +0100
  Re: [GIT pull] x86/timers for 4.10 Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2017-02-23 11:30 +0100
    Re: [GIT pull] x86/timers for 4.10 Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-02-23 14:40 +0100

csiph-web