Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1585864
| From | Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone |
| Date | 2017-02-22 03:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tduxs-2Ly-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t6mEG-2zZ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6JUC-QC-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdff4-Kd-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdjLI-3P2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdl19-4zS-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 21-02-17 23:35:07, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > Michal Hocko wrote: > > > OK, so it seems that all the distractions are handled now and linux-next > > > should provide a reasonable base for testing. You said you weren't able > > > to reproduce the original long stalls on too_many_isolated(). I would be > > > still interested to see those oom reports and potential anomalies in the > > > isolated counts before I send the patch for inclusion so your further > > > testing would be more than appreciated. Also stalls > 10s without any > > > previous occurrences would be interesting. > > > > I confirmed that linux-next-20170221 with kmallocwd applied can reproduce > > infinite too_many_isolated() loop problem. Please send your patches to linux-next. > > So I assume that you didn't see the lockup with the patch applied and > the OOM killer has resolved the situation by killing other tasks, right? > Can I assume your Tested-by? No. I tested linux-next-20170221 which does not include your patch. I didn't test linux-next-20170221 with your patch applied. Your patch will avoid infinite too_many_isolated() loop problem in shrink_inactive_list(). But we need to test different workloads by other people. Thus, I suggest you to send your patches to linux-next without my testing. > > Thanks for your testing! > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-21 10:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-02-21 15:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-21 17:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-02-22 03:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-22 09:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-02-26 07:40 +0100
csiph-web