Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1585864

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone

From Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone
Date 2017-02-22 03:10 +0100
Message-ID <tduxs-2Ly-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t6mEG-2zZ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6JUC-QC-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdff4-Kd-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdjLI-3P2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdl19-4zS-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 21-02-17 23:35:07, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > OK, so it seems that all the distractions are handled now and linux-next
> > > should provide a reasonable base for testing. You said you weren't able
> > > to reproduce the original long stalls on too_many_isolated(). I would be
> > > still interested to see those oom reports and potential anomalies in the
> > > isolated counts before I send the patch for inclusion so your further
> > > testing would be more than appreciated. Also stalls > 10s without any
> > > previous occurrences would be interesting.
> > 
> > I confirmed that linux-next-20170221 with kmallocwd applied can reproduce
> > infinite too_many_isolated() loop problem. Please send your patches to linux-next.
> 
> So I assume that you didn't see the lockup with the patch applied and
> the OOM killer has resolved the situation by killing other tasks, right?
> Can I assume your Tested-by?

No. I tested linux-next-20170221 which does not include your patch.
I didn't test linux-next-20170221 with your patch applied. Your patch will
avoid infinite too_many_isolated() loop problem in shrink_inactive_list().
But we need to test different workloads by other people. Thus, I suggest
you to send your patches to linux-next without my testing.

> 
> Thanks for your testing!
> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages  per zone Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-21 10:50 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-02-21 15:40 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages  per zone Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-21 17:00 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-02-22 03:10 +0100
        Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages  per zone Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-22 09:00 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-02-26 07:40 +0100

csiph-web