Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1585030

Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount

From "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount
Date 2017-02-21 05:40 +0100
Message-ID <tdap3-5Vf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <t7LhE-1lw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t7UkW-7hD-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <td6Ou-3u9-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <td8Qh-4Hv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <td9W2-5Lg-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


James Bottomley:
> With a different owner view, but that's irrelevant to the underlying
> inode.

Ok, the different ownership is limited within shitfs (or userns,
container). Good. I might forget that shiftfs wants to behave like
bind-mount.

And I noticed that shiftfs setattr() converts uid/gid before calling
backend fs' ->setattr(). It is good too.
But how about acl? Won't such conversion be necessary for acl too?


J. R. Okajima

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2017-02-21 01:50 +0100
  Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 04:00 +0100
    Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2017-02-21 05:10 +0100
      Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 05:40 +0100

csiph-web