Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1586335
| From | "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH 1/4] fs, afs: convert afs_cell.usage from atomic_t to refcount_t |
| Date | 2017-02-22 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tdITL-57Y-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tdkRr-4uK-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdkRr-4uK-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdHO2-4nL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com> wrote: > > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > > situations. > > This causes an assertion failure because cells aren't immediately destroyed > when their refcount reaches 0, but may be resurrected provided the cache lock > is held. However, attempting to increment the 0 refcount does nothing, not > even giving a warning. This is strange, it is supposed to give a warning I think now when it is even not inlined. Peter, am I confusing smth? > > So please place a hold on this patch. I will check the other AFS patches also. > Thank you very much David for testing the patches! I guess for this one and other two patches it means that if we want to do the atomic_t --> refcount_t conversions, we need to do +1 on the whole counting scheme to avoid issues around reaching zero. Do you see this approach reasonable? I can give it a try, if it makes sense in your opinion. Best Regards, Elena.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/4] fs, afs: convert afs_cell.usage from atomic_t to refcount_t Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com> - 2017-02-21 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs, afs: convert afs_cell.usage from atomic_t to refcount_t David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2017-02-22 17:20 +0100
RE: [PATCH 1/4] fs, afs: convert afs_cell.usage from atomic_t to refcount_t "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@intel.com> - 2017-02-22 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs, afs: convert afs_cell.usage from atomic_t to refcount_t Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-02-22 18:40 +0100
RE: [PATCH 1/4] fs, afs: convert afs_cell.usage from atomic_t to refcount_t "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@intel.com> - 2017-02-23 14:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs, afs: convert afs_cell.usage from atomic_t to refcount_t David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2017-02-24 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs, afs: convert afs_cell.usage from atomic_t to refcount_t David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2017-02-22 18:40 +0100
csiph-web