Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration

From	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration
Date	2017-02-22 16:50 +0100
Message-ID	<tdHl0-3U4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tdEGu-1Nw-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdEZP-2cZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdGyD-3dk-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdGIi-3wm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdHbk-3Iw-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 23:36 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:

> Sorry. Mike.
> What you mean of 'took the zero added cycles option'? :)

#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
...
#endif

I waved my magic ifdef wand, and poof, they disappeared :)

	-Mike

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-02-22 14:00 +0100
  Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-22 14:20 +0100
    Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-02-22 14:20 +0100
      Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-22 15:40 +0100
        Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-02-22 16:00 +0100
          Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-02-23 13:30 +0100
            Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-02-23 14:20 +0100
              Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-02-23 15:10 +0100
            Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-02-23 15:10 +0100
              Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-02-23 23:40 +0100
                Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-02-24 03:00 +0100
                [PATCH] cpuidle: menu: Avoid taking spinlock for accessing QoS values "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-02-24 13:40 +0100
      Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-02-22 15:40 +0100
        Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-02-22 15:50 +0100
    Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-02-22 16:00 +0100
      Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-02-22 16:10 +0100
        Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-02-22 16:40 +0100
          Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency  consideration Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-02-22 16:50 +0100

csiph-web